2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cloudcom.2013.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Machine Placement Optimization Supporting Performance SLAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Google cluster data trace [21] The migration impact factor, w net 0.8 [12] The migration impact factor, w men 0.6 [12] The migration impact factor, w disk 0.4 [12] The migration impact factor, w cpu 0.1 [12] Initially, each Avatar is deployed in the available cloudlet, which is the closest to its UE. First, we set up the penalty coefficient α = 5 and run the simulation.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Google cluster data trace [21] The migration impact factor, w net 0.8 [12] The migration impact factor, w men 0.6 [12] The migration impact factor, w disk 0.4 [12] The migration impact factor, w cpu 0.1 [12] Initially, each Avatar is deployed in the available cloudlet, which is the closest to its UE. First, we set up the penalty coefficient α = 5 and run the simulation.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, we have Eq. 4 and thus prove Lemma 1. proportional to the weighted sum of utilization of different resources [12]:…”
Section: ) Total Migration Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research works demonstrated that considering the VMP problem for efficient management of resources could result in significant improvement in energy-efficiency, Quality of Service (QoS) and carbon dioxide emissions; all of them with high economical and ecological impact [2], [5], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migrating a proxy VM from the source cloudlet to the destination cloudlet may introduce non-negligible energy consumption from both source and destination cloudlets [45]; thus, designing a proxy VM migration strategy without considering the migration energy consumption may significantly increase the total ongrid energy consumption [46]. From the performance of the proxy VM perspective, the migration overheads indicate the performance degradation of the proxy VM [47]. Specifically, conducting data sharing and analytics in a proxy VM consumes CPU, memory, and network resource of the proxy VM; meanwhile, proxy VM migration is considered as an expensive application, which consumes a significant amount of resources in the proxy VM.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%