Virtual outreach: economic evaluation of joint teleconsultations for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion

Abstract

Objectives To test the hypotheses that, compared with conventional outpatient consultations, joint teleconsultation (virtual outreach) would incur no increased costs to the NHS, reduce costs to patients, and reduce absences from work by patients and their carers. Design Cost consequences study alongside randomised controlled trial. Setting Two hospitals in London and Shrewsbury and 29 general practices in inner London and Wales. Participants 3170 patients identified; 2094 eligible for inclusion and willing to participate. 1051 randomised to virtual outreach and 1043 to standard outpatient appointments. Main outcome measures NHS costs, patient costs, health status (SF-12), time spent attending index consultation, patient satisfaction. Results Overall six months costs were greater for the virtual outreach consultations (£724 per patient) than for conventional outpatient appointments (£625): difference in means £99 ($162; €138) (95% confidence interval £10 to £187, P=0.03). If the analysis is restricted to resource items deemed "attributable" to the index consultation, six month costs were still greater for virtual outreach: difference in means £108 (£73 to £142, P < 0.0001). In both analyses the index consultation accounted for the excess cost. Savings to patients in terms of costs and time occurred in both centres: difference in mean total patient cost £8 (£5 to £10, P < 0.0001). Loss of productive time was less in the virtual outreach group: difference in mean cost £11 (£10 to £12, P < 0.0001). Conclusion The main hypothesis that virtual outreach would be cost neutral is rejected, but the hypotheses that costs to patients and losses in productivity would be lower are supported.

Telemedicine in pediatric and perinatal cardiology: Economic evaluation of a service in English hospitals

“…The district clinicians, when deciding on the methods of referral for their patients, may have been influenced by the relatively short distances of 35 to 65 miles between their hospitals and London, even though emergency teleconsultations were easily arranged, particularly on weekdays. Our equivocal 6-month cost results differ from those of a randomized controlled trial of a telemedicine (virtual outreach) service for routine outpatient consultations in two NHS hospitals, in which the virtual outreach 6-month mean cost was significantly greater than the standard outpatient clinic cost (15). The virtual outreach system linked primary care physicians with consultants in eight specialties by means of personal computers and ISDN-2 lines (15;34).…”

“…An annual equivalent cost for the telemedicine items in each hospital, including installation of the ISDN-6 lines and 17.5 percent value added tax (VAT), was calculated, with an expected lifetime for the equipment of 5 years (15), and an annual discount rate of 3.5 percent (14). Telephone bills provided details of ISDN-6 line rental, call charges, and VAT.…”

Scientific Basis of Dealing with the Cost Issues in Routine Oncology Practice in Low & Middle Income Countries

“…The relative efficiency of different options would depend on the implicit or explicit values attached by decision makers to the different elements of cost and outcome. Various options are compared in a easy to follow format which is displayed as tables [6].…”

Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Remote Orthopedic Consultations: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

“…Teleorthopaedics involve the delivery of specialist services across a distance, usually between an orthopaedic surgeon and a patient [12]. It has been reported that teleorthopaedics in an outpatient setting is safe and without serious adverse events [13], that it has increased patient satisfaction [14,15] reduced travels and saved time for the patients [16,17] and reduced costs [18]. Teleorthopaedics can also improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation after orthopaedic surgery [4].…”