This thesis analyzes the factors affecting the performance evaluation in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, focusing on preclinical scanners. It explores the possibilities of standard protocols of assessment on the following aspects: their use as tools to validate Monte Carlo simulation programs, their usefulness as a method for comparing scanners and their validity in the study of the effect of alternative radioisotopes on image quality.Initially we study the methods of performance evaluation oriented to validate PET simulations. For this we present the GAMOS program as a simulation framework and show the results of its validation based on the standard NEMA NU 4-2008 for preclinical PET scanners. This has been accomplished by comparing simulated results against experimental acquisitions in the ClearPET scanner, describing the methodology for the evaluation and selection of NEMA parameters. This section also mentions the contributions developed in GAMOS for PET applications, such as the inclusion of tools for image reconstruction. Furthermore, the evaluation of the ClearPET scanner is used to compare its performance against another preclinical scanner, specifically the rPET-1 system. This is the first complete NEMA NU 4 based characterization study of both systems. At the same time we analyze how do the significant design differences of these two systems, especially the size of the axial field of view and the detectors configuration affect their performance characteristics. 68 Ga is one of the unconventional radioisotopes in PET imaging the use of which is currently significantly increasing; however, it presents the disadvantage of the long positron range (distance traveled by the emitted positron before annihilating with an electron). Besides the positron range, additional gamma photon emission is another physical property characteristic of PET radioisotopes that can affect the reconstructed image quality, as it happens to the isotope 48 V. In this thesis we assess these effects through studies of spatial resolution and image quality. Finally, we analyze the scope of the NEMA NU 4-2008 to carry out such studies, adapting it and proposing possible modifications.iii
AgradecimientosMe gustaría dar las gracias en primer lugar a los dos directores que han posibilitado el desarrollo y conclusión de esta tesis. A Miguel Embid, por haber confiado en mi hace ya seis