2020
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliv-m-1-2020-465-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Reality to Support Technical Knowledge in Cultural Heritage. The Case Study of Cryptoporticus in the Archaeological Site of Egnatia (Italy)

Abstract: Abstract. Digitalization and interactivity of reality in Augmented and Virtual Environments represent the synergic union between current technology potentialities and smartness of users in going beyond the traditional perception of real environment. As it is well-known, touristic bodies already taken advantages of Virtual Environments as cultural and touristic promotion of historic and archaeological sites. However, the analysis of potentialities in supporting technical community and professionals are still un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Rysanek et al, 2017) pointed out on weakness of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for conservation activities on existing buildings, caused by BIM parameterization, to propose Virtual Reality platforms for navigating physical environments, created with equirectangular images, labelled with data or text widgets. In the same direction, (Castagnetti et al, 2017;De Fino et al, 2019 andCantatore et al, 2020) proposed workflows for employing Virtual Reality with the aim of streamlining the management of technical knowledge in cultural heritage. (Ferrari and Medici, 2017), within the scope of the INCEPTION project, tested the Virtual experience mock-up for captured technical data accessibility (digital documentation and 3D survey).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(Rysanek et al, 2017) pointed out on weakness of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for conservation activities on existing buildings, caused by BIM parameterization, to propose Virtual Reality platforms for navigating physical environments, created with equirectangular images, labelled with data or text widgets. In the same direction, (Castagnetti et al, 2017;De Fino et al, 2019 andCantatore et al, 2020) proposed workflows for employing Virtual Reality with the aim of streamlining the management of technical knowledge in cultural heritage. (Ferrari and Medici, 2017), within the scope of the INCEPTION project, tested the Virtual experience mock-up for captured technical data accessibility (digital documentation and 3D survey).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of conservation state through the elaboration of thematic maps about crack and damp patterns and building pathologies according to the UNI 11182/2006, is generally represented in CAD, recently in BIM. In VERBuM process and product, the decay mapping procedures tested by (Cantatore et al, 2020;Fino et al, 2019) are performed, on the basis of on-site preliminary identification and representation through the annotation tool present in the VERBuM platform.…”
Section: Fig 3: (A) Verbum Augmented With Archival and Bibliographic Studies; (B) Annotation Tool For On-site Decay Mapping (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the presence of narrow spaces or occlusions could increase the quantity of photographs needed to cover the structure using normal focal lenses mounted in non-metric cameras. So some alternative procedures, such as the use of wide angle lens (Gómez-Lahoz, González-Aguilera, 2009;Mozas et al, 2012;Martínez et al, 2013;Fiorillo et al, 2016), fisheye lens (Boulianne et al, 1997;Kedzierski, Waczykowski, 2007;Georgantas et al, 2012;Covas et al, 2015;Perfetti et al 2017;Barazzetti et al, 2017b) and 360 degrees cameras (Pérez-Ramos, Robleda-Prieto, 2016;Kossieris et al, 2017;Mandelli et al, 2017;Barazzetti et al, 2017a;Fangi et al, 2018;Cantatore et al 2020;Bertellini et al, 2019) were implemented in order to reduce the quantity of images needed to cover the object. The use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) (Colomina, Molina, 2014;Nex, Remondino, 2014;Campana, 2017) and masts (Georgopoulos, 1999;Mozas-Calvache et al, 2012;Martínez et al 2013;Ortiz et al, 2013;Blockley, Morandi, 2015;Martínez et al, 2015;Pérez et al, 2019;Mozas-Calvache et al, 2019) to lift cameras supposes a useful alternative to photographs acquired from the ground because of the improvement of the coverage of the object (usually on the terrain) and the reduction of the occlusions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%