Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences

Abstract

Background Graduate Medical Education training programs transitioned to all-virtual recruitment in 2020. Limited data have been published regarding the consequences of this transition. We aimed to understand (1) infectious diseases (ID) fellowship programs’ recruitment efforts and the effect of virtual recruitment on application and interview numbers, and (2) the number of programs to which matched applicants applied and interviewed, and their perspectives on virtual recruitment. Methods In 2020-21 we surveyed all United States ID fellowship program directors (PDs) and matched applicants. Descriptive data analysis was performed on quantitative survey items. Free-text responses were analyzed through a quantitative content analysis approach. Results PD response rate was 68/158 (43%); applicant response rate was at least 23% (85/365). PDs reported a 27% increase in mean number of applications received and a 45% increase in mean number of applicants interviewed compared to the previous year. Applicants especially valued online program structure information, PD program overview videos, didactic and curriculum content, and fellow testimonials and profiles. Most applicants preferred interviews lasting no more than 40 minutes and interview days lasting no more than 5 hours. Nearly all (60/64, 94%) PDs adequately learned about candidates; most (48/64, 75%) felt unable to showcase their program as well as when in-person. Most PDs (54/64, 84%) and applicants (56/73, 77%) want an option for virtual recruitment. Conclusions Virtual recruitment enabled programs to accommodate more applicants and highlighted applicants’ preferences for programs’ augmented online presences and time-limited interview days. Most programs and applicants want an option for virtual interviews.

Expectations versus reality: Understanding the accuracy of impressions made during virtual interviews of pediatric pulmonary fellowship programs

“…For instance, there are guidelines for applicants on how to optimize internet connection, background lighting, and time spent on breaks 2–4 . There are also resources highlighting innovative ways training programs adapted typical interview‐day activities into the virtual format, such as hospital tours and social events 1,5–11 . Applicants and training programs alike can now access these resources and recommendations on the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) websites 12,13…”

What’s Worth Doing in Virtual Recruitment? A Regional Survey of Program Directors and Incoming Interns

“…As we move into a future where virtual interviews may continue to be the norm or at least an option for many, 9 our study provides insight to residency programs on the types of recruitment strategies that students are most likely to find most valuable in their rank order discernment. In particular, we recommend setting up the virtual interview process to maximize interactions with current residents and to make sure all interviewees have a chance to interview with multiple individuals in different positions across the program.…”

Emerging from the Pandemic: AAIM Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency and Fellowship Interview Standards

“…Virtual interviewing offers an efficient and widely acceptable format for both applicants and programs. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The efficiency offered by virtual interviews results in time savings for applicants, minimizing time away from their clinical education and training as well as greater flexibility in interview scheduling. All-virtual interviews reduce financial costs associated with the interview process for both applicants and programs.…”

“… 1 , 2 , 3 Early data from all-virtual GME interview experiences suggest that virtual interviews are widely acceptable to applicants as well as to program directors and allow both groups to adequately learn about each other. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 New recommendations are needed to guide what successful elements of virtual season interview cycles should continue as travel restrictions end.…”