Virtual Screening for HIV Protease Inhibitors: A Comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina

Abstract

BackgroundThe AutoDock family of software has been widely used in protein-ligand docking research. This study compares AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina in the context of virtual screening by using these programs to select compounds active against HIV protease.Methodology/Principal FindingsBoth programs were used to rank the members of two chemical libraries, each containing experimentally verified binders to HIV protease. In the case of the NCI Diversity Set II, both AutoDock 4 and Vina were able to select active compounds significantly better than random (AUC = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively; p<0.001). The binding energy predictions were highly correlated in this case, with r = 0.63 and ι = 0.82. For a set of larger, more flexible compounds from the Directory of Universal Decoys, the binding energy predictions were not correlated, and only Vina was able to rank compounds significantly better than random.Conclusions/SignificanceIn ranking smaller molecules with few rotatable bonds, AutoDock 4 and Vina were equally capable, though both exhibited a size-related bias in scoring. However, as Vina executes more quickly and is able to more accurately rank larger molecules, researchers should look to it first when undertaking a virtual screen.

Study of potential xanthine oxidase inhibitors: In silico and in vitro biological activity

“…AutoDock was run several times to get various docked conformations, and used to analyze the predicted docking energy. The binding sites for these molecules were selected based on the ligand-binding pocket of the templates (Chang et al, 2010).…”

Current Advances in Computational Strategies for Drug Discovery in Leishmaniasis

“…One very popular tool is AutoDock (Goodsell., et al 1996), which was developed by the Scripps Institute and used in several virtual screening projects, demonstrating good performance and accuracy. However, a recent study (Chang., et al 2010) compared the accuracy and reproducibility of AutoDock against a recently developed tool, also freely available, called AutoDock Vina (Trott & Olson 2010). The experiments consisted of screening ligands with known activity against the HIV protease and decoys or non-binders.…”

SWFB and GA Strategies for Variable Selection in QSAR Studies for the Validation of Thiazolidine- 2,4-Dione Derivatives as Promising Antitumor Candidates

“…Each docking produced multiple conformations along with corresponding binding energy scores which were computed using AutoDock scoring function. 28 The conformations were ranked based on the scores; a lower scoring conformation was ranked higher. An RMSD value was also computed based on the conformation of the bound ligand (true conformation) and the docked conformation of the ligand.…”