2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21672-5_54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Structured Dialogic Design as Tool for Analysis of Threats before Implementing European Dialogues Aiming to Identify R&D Gaps in Assistive ICT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bausch & Flanagan, 2013; Christakis, 2004; Christakis & Bausch, 2006; Christakis & Harris, 2004; Christakis et al, 1999; Cisneros & Hisijara, 2013; Flanagan, 2020; Flanagan & Christakis, 2009; Hays & Michaelides, 2004; Laouris, 2012; Schreibman & Christakis, 2007). The authors' group alone has applied the SDD process in more than 100 different contexts, 1 including peace and conflict resolution (Laouris, 2004; Laouris, Michaelides, et al, 2009; Laouris, Erel, et al, 2009; Laouris et al, 2015); discovering and collectively agreeing on research agenda priorities, thus influencing European Commission funding (Laouris & Michaelides, 2007; Laouris et al, 2011, 2017; CARDIAC 2 ); capacity building of youth and civil society 3,4 ; reforming and bridging gaps in education and democracy (Laouris, 2015; Laouris & Laouri, 2008; Laouris & Romm, 2022; Laouris et al, 2010); and response to the COVID‐19 outbreak in Africa (Laouris et al, 2022). More recently, the SDD has been proposed as a problem structuring method (PSM) within the repertoire of operational research (OR) tools (Laouris & Michaelides, 2018; Laouris & Romm, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bausch & Flanagan, 2013; Christakis, 2004; Christakis & Bausch, 2006; Christakis & Harris, 2004; Christakis et al, 1999; Cisneros & Hisijara, 2013; Flanagan, 2020; Flanagan & Christakis, 2009; Hays & Michaelides, 2004; Laouris, 2012; Schreibman & Christakis, 2007). The authors' group alone has applied the SDD process in more than 100 different contexts, 1 including peace and conflict resolution (Laouris, 2004; Laouris, Michaelides, et al, 2009; Laouris, Erel, et al, 2009; Laouris et al, 2015); discovering and collectively agreeing on research agenda priorities, thus influencing European Commission funding (Laouris & Michaelides, 2007; Laouris et al, 2011, 2017; CARDIAC 2 ); capacity building of youth and civil society 3,4 ; reforming and bridging gaps in education and democracy (Laouris, 2015; Laouris & Laouri, 2008; Laouris & Romm, 2022; Laouris et al, 2010); and response to the COVID‐19 outbreak in Africa (Laouris et al, 2022). More recently, the SDD has been proposed as a problem structuring method (PSM) within the repertoire of operational research (OR) tools (Laouris & Michaelides, 2018; Laouris & Romm, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%