Virtual Tracers to Detect Sources of Water and Track Water Reuse across a River Basin

Abstract

Water managers around the world face the increasingly challenging task to evaluate the impacts of technological measures and policy mechanisms from the local to the river basin scale. A toolset providing quantitative, actionable information on dependencies and trade-offs between upstream and downstream water users is currently lacking. Yet, any intervention needs to be assessed in terms of consequences for downstream water users. This study evaluates the potential of a tracer-like approach, implemented in the water allocation software WEAP, to quantitatively track return flows and their downstream reuse in the river basin context. The WEAP-Virtual Tracer (WEAP-VT) approach was successfully applied to one of Europe’s driest river basins, the Segura River Basin in Spain. For each water demand site, the different original sources of water supply, dependency on upstream return flows, and downstream reuse of its return flow were assessed. Based on these results, agricultural, urban, and environmental water users were evaluated in terms of their suitability for water saving measures and their vulnerability to the reduction in upstream return flows. A scenario analysis simulating the improvement of local efficiency improvements shows that specific irrigation schemes and ecosystems become deprived of water. Hence, efficiency improvement in water-scarce basins should be considered with caution. The demonstrated ability to quantify key water reuse indicators for individual water users and at different aggregation levels makes WEAP-VT a valuable tool to support water resource management decisions.

Global Prediction of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Using Random Forest in a Covariate‐Based GeoTransfer Function (CoGTF) Framework

“…Likewise, Zhang and Schaap (2017) developed a global map of Ksat based on the Rosetta 3 PTF, employing artificial neural networks and bootstrap sampling (an extension of Schaap et al, 2001), and making use of two datasets from the USA (Rawls et al, 1982;Ahuja et al, 1989) and the Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Database, UNSODA (Leij et al, 1996;Nemes et al, 2001). Similarly, Simons et al (2020) Maps based on PTFs have several limitations. They are usually developed for specific geographic regions and thus only represent local conditions of soil forming processes (e.g.…”

A New Framework of 17 Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS17) for Supporting River Basin Planning and Environmental Monitoring

“…While water from leaking irrigation fields, reservoirs and artificially created canals is clearly an example of anthropogenic recharge q ↓ anth [73], it is believed nevertheless to be valuable for describing total recharge as an ecosystem service, for instance to ensure sufficient drinking water for the domestic sector. Recharge from a leaking river q ↓ riv is partially natural, but also partially anthropogenic because river flow is a result of upstream interventions in the water cycle.…”

Contribution of Fresh Submarine Groundwater Discharge to the Gulf of Alaska

“…The water content of the reservoir θ(t) is the volume of water within the reservoir S 1 (t) divided by the total volume of the reservoir V tot , where V tot = S max /ε 1 and ε 1 = θ sat -θ res . For both the top soil and sub soil reservoirs, N, α, θ sat , θ res , and saturated hydraulic conductivity K sat (cm/day) are provided by the HiHydroSoil v2.0 data set at a resolution of 250 m worldwide (Simons et al, 2020). This data set gives values for the top soil and sub soil at 0-0.3 m and 0.3-2.0 m depth, respectively.…”