2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2915919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtualized Network Function Consolidation Based on Multiple Status Characteristics

Abstract: In network function virtualization (NFV), network function implemented in software on the generally shared servers is called virtualized network function (VNF). The characteristics of virtualization provide service function chain (SFC) provisioning with the required flexibility by allowing for placing VNFs anywhere and anytime. However, there may be a large number of servers with low utilization across the network at the low-load time, leading to enormous loss of energy. VNF consolidation, as an effective way … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having reached a maximum by the end of the first decade of the years 2000, the attention on the theme has been slightly decreasing with the advent of network virtualization and softwarization brought forth by SDN, NFV, and the advent of 5G (with some notable exceptions, like [95,154,155], among others). As we noted in the Introduction, the reason can be attributed to the belief that the increased flexibility and the consolidation of resources made possible by virtualized networking components (see, e.g., [156][157][158]) would have sufficed not only to compensate the increased energy consumption caused by the adoption of general-purpose hardware, but also to curb it in general. We noticed that this is not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having reached a maximum by the end of the first decade of the years 2000, the attention on the theme has been slightly decreasing with the advent of network virtualization and softwarization brought forth by SDN, NFV, and the advent of 5G (with some notable exceptions, like [95,154,155], among others). As we noted in the Introduction, the reason can be attributed to the belief that the increased flexibility and the consolidation of resources made possible by virtualized networking components (see, e.g., [156][157][158]) would have sufficed not only to compensate the increased energy consumption caused by the adoption of general-purpose hardware, but also to curb it in general. We noticed that this is not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results indicate that the proposed method has higher efficiency in terms of energy, bandwidth, migration cost, etc. [17]. Blocking the line head at the current bandwidth receiver can affect overall network performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resource allocation problem, considering constraints on delay, link utilization, and server utilization, is presented in [30], which enables energy-aware SFC for SDN-based networks. In order to achieve the trade-off among energy saving, bandwidth usage minimization, and migration cost reduction, the authors of [31] propose a VNF consolidation method (VCMM), which determines appropriate servers to be turned off by leveraging neural network with multiple characteristics of network status as input. VCMM migrates VNFs on servers to turn them off by adopting a greedy mechanism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%