2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-013-0677-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtually Forgotten: Special Education Students in Cyber Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While prior literature argued, in general, no marked difference was found in student demographics between virtual schools and traditional schools (Carnahan & Fulton, 2013;Hubbard & Mitchell, 2011;Ryman & Kossan, 2011), the research on Ohio's virtual schools depicted a different picture. Ohio's virtual schools, according to Wang and Decker (forthcoming), are seen as an alternative to traditional schooling, signifying that they attract marginalized students and this may partially explain why they experience poorer student performance.…”
Section: Virtual Schools Enroll Higher Proportion Of Marginalized Stumentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While prior literature argued, in general, no marked difference was found in student demographics between virtual schools and traditional schools (Carnahan & Fulton, 2013;Hubbard & Mitchell, 2011;Ryman & Kossan, 2011), the research on Ohio's virtual schools depicted a different picture. Ohio's virtual schools, according to Wang and Decker (forthcoming), are seen as an alternative to traditional schooling, signifying that they attract marginalized students and this may partially explain why they experience poorer student performance.…”
Section: Virtual Schools Enroll Higher Proportion Of Marginalized Stumentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In other words, the lower student performance may be due to the online delivery format and may not necessarily be tied to the type of students who attend. Carnahan and Fulton (2013) found that special education students at Pennsylvania's virtual schools scored 6% lower on proficiency measures than the state average. Specifically, in 2008, special education students' proficiency rate was 39.9% at the state level and 33.9% within virtual schools.…”
Section: Virtual Schools Enroll Higher Proportion Of Marginalized Stumentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to Miron and Urshchel (), ‘full‐time virtual schools have gone from barely a blip on the radar screen a decade ago to enrolling approximately 275,000 students in 2011–2012’. It would seem that parents and policymakers are finding the value of this alternative to traditional ‘bricks and mortar’ education, and policymakers are dedicating time to evaluating the overall quality of online education (Miron & Urschel, ; Carnahan & Fulton, ) as it increasingly becomes a school of choice.…”
Section: Online Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student‐centred approaches, collaborative learning, independent inquiry and research and student discussions are all teaching practices associated with many online programmes (Cavanaugh, ). The integration of multimedia, simulations and interactive software to gain a broader perspective of a given curriculum can also enhance instruction via online education (Paige, ; Carnahan & Fulton, ). Additionally, teachers can utilise multiple tools not only to enhance course curriculum, but also to support teacher–student communication (DiPietro et al, ).…”
Section: Benefits Of Online Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors claim that virtual school programs, which are aligned with the 5Cs, have closed achievement gaps and increased completion rates among students with disabilities. Carnahan and Fulton (2013) called attention to the fact that the population of special education students in cyber schools mirrors the population of special education students in brick-and-mortar classrooms, thus it is important to understand the characteristics associated with educating these learners in a virtual setting.…”
Section: Convenience For Differently Abled Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%