2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2018.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtually free finite-normal-subgroup-free groups are strongly verbally closed

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let N c be the variety of all nilpotent groups of class at most c and N r,c a free nilpotent group of finite rank r and nilpotency class c. A subgroup H of N r,c is verbally closed in N r,c if and only if H is a free factor of N r,c in the variety N c (equivalently, an algebraically closed subgroup, or a retract of N r,c ). Some other results on verbal closedness can be found in [30,31,37,38,39]. Problem 5.2 is solved in this paper, see Corollary 2.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let N c be the variety of all nilpotent groups of class at most c and N r,c a free nilpotent group of finite rank r and nilpotency class c. A subgroup H of N r,c is verbally closed in N r,c if and only if H is a free factor of N r,c in the variety N c (equivalently, an algebraically closed subgroup, or a retract of N r,c ). Some other results on verbal closedness can be found in [30,31,37,38,39]. Problem 5.2 is solved in this paper, see Corollary 2.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In the second direction one studies properties of algebraically, existentially, and verbally closed groups in certain overgroups or classes of groups (see Definition 2.1 below and a general definition of S-closedness suggested by Neumann in [45]). For problems and results in this area see the surveys of Leinen [34] and Roman'kov [55], and the papers [4,30,31,36,42,44,45,56,57,58,60]. Note that this branch of group theory is closely related to logic in the form of model theory and recursive functions, see the book of Higman and Scott [22], appendix A.4 in the book of Hodges [23], and the paper [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10] Mazhuga showed that if H is a verbally closed subgroup of a group G, then H is algebraically closed in G. This result (except the very special case H = Z 2 * Z 2 , which was first considered in [7]) follows from our Theorem C. Indeed, H can be splitted as H = A * B, where A and B are nontrivial; hence H is relatively hyperbolic with respect to {A, B}. It is well known that if a non-(virtually cyclic) group is relatively hyperbolic with respect to a collection of proper subgroups, then it is acylindrically hyperbolic.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem Cmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…• Theorem C, says that for any clean acylindrically hyperbolic group H and any overgroup G of H the notions of verbal and algebraic closedness of H in G are equivalent. Some special cases of this theorem were considered earlier in [7] and [10], see Remark 7.1 below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Заметим, что первый пункт приведенной выше теоремы описывает определенный класс сильно вербально замкнутых групп (в частности, все нетривиальные свободные группы принадлежат этому классу). Из результатов работ [11] и [13] следует:…”
unclassified