2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virulence factors genes of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from caprine subclinical mastitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To gain insight into the virulence profiles of the NAS species we also included all the publicly available annotated genome sequences of S. agnetis , S. chromogenes and S. simulans of veterinary origin and searched the putative virulence factors from these isolates ( Calcutt et al, 2013 ; Calcutt et al, 2014 ; Fry et al, 2014a ; Seixas et al, 2014 ; Al-Rubaye et al, 2015 ). Altogether, the virulence gene profiles of these ( Table S7 ) and our own isolates were similar to each other and profiles found in other studies ( Akineden et al, 2001 ; Srinivasan et al, 2006 ; Thomas et al, 2006 ; Kalorey et al, 2007 ; Sung, Lloyd & Lindsay, 2008 ; Hart, Hart & Roop, 2009 ; Oliveira et al, 2011 ; Wilson et al, 2011 ; Piessens et al, 2012 ; Simojoki et al, 2012 ; Tang et al, 2013 ; Tremblay et al, 2013 ; Nemeghaire et al, 2014 ; Salaberry et al, 2015 ; Snell et al, 2015 ; Xu et al, 2015 ; Adkins, Middleton & Fox, 2016 ; Artursson et al, 2016 ; Casaes Nunes et al, 2016 ; Kot et al, 2016 ; Mello et al, 2016 ). Some differences existed, however, mostly on the presence/absence of toxins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To gain insight into the virulence profiles of the NAS species we also included all the publicly available annotated genome sequences of S. agnetis , S. chromogenes and S. simulans of veterinary origin and searched the putative virulence factors from these isolates ( Calcutt et al, 2013 ; Calcutt et al, 2014 ; Fry et al, 2014a ; Seixas et al, 2014 ; Al-Rubaye et al, 2015 ). Altogether, the virulence gene profiles of these ( Table S7 ) and our own isolates were similar to each other and profiles found in other studies ( Akineden et al, 2001 ; Srinivasan et al, 2006 ; Thomas et al, 2006 ; Kalorey et al, 2007 ; Sung, Lloyd & Lindsay, 2008 ; Hart, Hart & Roop, 2009 ; Oliveira et al, 2011 ; Wilson et al, 2011 ; Piessens et al, 2012 ; Simojoki et al, 2012 ; Tang et al, 2013 ; Tremblay et al, 2013 ; Nemeghaire et al, 2014 ; Salaberry et al, 2015 ; Snell et al, 2015 ; Xu et al, 2015 ; Adkins, Middleton & Fox, 2016 ; Artursson et al, 2016 ; Casaes Nunes et al, 2016 ; Kot et al, 2016 ; Mello et al, 2016 ). Some differences existed, however, mostly on the presence/absence of toxins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In 15 isolates of S. intermedius, obtained from cases of caprine subclinical mastitis, the most frequent genes encoding surface proteins involved in adhesion were laminin, elastin and fibrinogen binding proteins, in addition to one for fibronectin binding protein A (Salaberry et al 2015). Genes encoding collagen binding protein and fibronectin binding protein B were not detected, and the bap gene, encoding biofilm-associated proteins was observed in only 13% of isolates.…”
Section: Staphylococcus Intermedius Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 15 S. intermedius isolated from subclinical mastitis, all genes encoding enterotoxins (A-E) were detected, with sec the most frequent (n ¼ 7) but only 6% (n ¼ 1) each of the others (Salaberry et al 2015). Due to their potential to cause vomiting and diarrhea, the presence of enterotoxins in non-aureus staphylococci could also be considered a risk in food-producing animals.…”
Section: Staphylococcus Intermedius Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 S. intermedius as infectious agent of domestic animals (mostly dogs, cats and pigeons) causes zoonotic infection in a wide range. 21,22 It is difficult to identify S. intermedius and S. pseudintermedius using conventional microbiological tests. Molecular diagnostic tools change the understanding of the epidemiology of these 2 organisms.…”
Section: The Status Of Zoonotic Staphylococcal Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%