1998
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.18.5.2986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus-Dependent Phosphorylation of the IRF-3 Transcription Factor Regulates Nuclear Translocation, Transactivation Potential, and Proteasome-Mediated Degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

55
948
3
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 851 publications
(1,010 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
55
948
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with the results of transfection experiments, suggesting that the protein components of the retarded complexes may be involved in viral induction of the NOXA promoter. The slower and faster migrating complexes contain IRF-1 and IRF-3, respectively, as indicated by specific inhibition of complex formation following preincubation of the EMSA reaction mix with anti-IRF-1 or anti-phospho-IRF-3 (the activated form of IRF-3 present during virus infection as described previously (Lin et al, 1998)), antibodies, respectively (Figure 5b). Together, these results suggest that SV infection induces the binding of IRF-1 and phospho-IRF-3 at the IRF-E site of the NOXA promoter, leading to the transcription of NOXA.…”
Section: Inactivation Of the Transcriptional Activity Of Wt-p53 In Resupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These results are in agreement with the results of transfection experiments, suggesting that the protein components of the retarded complexes may be involved in viral induction of the NOXA promoter. The slower and faster migrating complexes contain IRF-1 and IRF-3, respectively, as indicated by specific inhibition of complex formation following preincubation of the EMSA reaction mix with anti-IRF-1 or anti-phospho-IRF-3 (the activated form of IRF-3 present during virus infection as described previously (Lin et al, 1998)), antibodies, respectively (Figure 5b). Together, these results suggest that SV infection induces the binding of IRF-1 and phospho-IRF-3 at the IRF-E site of the NOXA promoter, leading to the transcription of NOXA.…”
Section: Inactivation Of the Transcriptional Activity Of Wt-p53 In Resupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The pcDNA3.1zeo-flag-I B␣2N plasmid was generated by subcloning the I B␣2N cDNA from the SVK3-I B␣2N constructs. Plasmids encoding Myc-IKK␣, Flag-IKK␤wt, and Flag-IKK␤DN were previously described (39). The pcDNA3.1zeo-myc-cRel plasmid was generated by cloning the PCR-amplified forward primer 5Ј-ATA TAA GCT TAG CGG AGC CAT GGC CTC CGG TGC GTA TAA-3Ј, reverse primer 5Ј-ATC GGA ATT CTA CAA AAT GCT GCA TCT ATA T-3Ј cRel sequence into the EcoRI/HindIII sites of the pcDNA3.1zeo-Myc vector.…”
Section: Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B) were prepared by cloning BglII-SalI fragment (Ϫ397 to ϩ5, filled in with Klenow enzyme) from RANTES/chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter plasmid (25) into the NheI site (filled in with Klenow enzyme) of the pGL3-basic vector, as previously described (24). The IRF-3, IRF-7, p65/p50, and CBP expression plasmids used in cotransfection experiments have been previously described (24,26).…”
Section: Plasmid Constructions and Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%