1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.4883292.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus inactivation and prevalence of GBV‐C in haemophiliacs

Abstract: Summary.A new putative hepatitis virus has recently been discovered and termed GB virus C (GBV-C). We investigated the prevalence of this virus among 50 haemophiliacs treated with non-virus-inactivated clotting factor concentrates prior to 1985 and 21 haemophiliacs treated exclusively with virus-inactivated clotting factor concentrates. In the first group the prevalence of GBV-C based on PCR and ELISA was 46%. In the second group the prevalence of GBV-C was similar to that of healthy blood donors (5%). We ther… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of GBV-C markers in group A was significantly higher than in group B (40.3% versus 5.3%; p < 0.0001). These data were consistent with studies of hemophilia cohorts in Germany (Nübling et al, 1997;Uhle et al, 1997) and other European countries (De Filippi et al, 1997;Gerolami et al, 1997;Tassies et al, 1999). Since in all these studies as well as in our study, the investigated blood samples were collected in the mid 1990s, the achieved data were comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The prevalence of GBV-C markers in group A was significantly higher than in group B (40.3% versus 5.3%; p < 0.0001). These data were consistent with studies of hemophilia cohorts in Germany (Nübling et al, 1997;Uhle et al, 1997) and other European countries (De Filippi et al, 1997;Gerolami et al, 1997;Tassies et al, 1999). Since in all these studies as well as in our study, the investigated blood samples were collected in the mid 1990s, the achieved data were comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%