2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus Stabilization with Enhanced Porous Superabsorbent Polymer (PSAP) Beads for Diagnostics and Surveillance

Abstract: The continuous outbreaks of viral pathogens raise tremendous challenges to public health. Early detection of viruses is essential to prevent and control their associated diseases. Due to the rapid degradation of viruses in the absence of host organisms, the handling, transport, and storage of virus samples without refrigeration are extremely challenging. In this study, we apply bovine serum albumin (BSA)-modified porous superabsorbent polymer (PSAP) beads for encapsulation and stabilization of viruses. The she… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the viral inactivation mechanisms, viral genome damage during disinfection by PFA, PAA, and free chlorine, was measured by RT-qPCR following previous methods (Text S5). , The rate constant for genome damage was calculated (eqs and ), and the reaction of the whole genome was predicted through the extrapolation of the RT-qPCR results (eq ). ln ( N N 0 ) = prefix− normalC · normalT × k RT‐qPCR = 2.3 × log 10 ( N N 0 ) k genome = L total L amp × k RT‐qPCR = L total × k normalized where k RT‑qPCR and k genome are the apparent degradation reaction rate constants of the RT-qPCR target regions and the entire genomes of the viruses, respectively, in L·mg –1 ·s –1 ; L amp is the size of the qPCR amplicons, i.e., 83 bases for MS2 and 280 bases (140 base pairs) for Φ6 in this study; L total is the size of the entire genome, i.e., 3600 bases for MS2 and 26 800 bases (13 400 base pairs) for Φ6; k normalized is the normalized rate constant in L·mg –1 ·s –1 ·base –1 ; C·T is the cumulative exposure to oxidants (in mg·s·L –1 ); N 0 is the initial concentration of genome (copies·mL –1 ); and N is the genome concentration after certain exposure to oxidants (copies·mL –1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the viral inactivation mechanisms, viral genome damage during disinfection by PFA, PAA, and free chlorine, was measured by RT-qPCR following previous methods (Text S5). , The rate constant for genome damage was calculated (eqs and ), and the reaction of the whole genome was predicted through the extrapolation of the RT-qPCR results (eq ). ln ( N N 0 ) = prefix− normalC · normalT × k RT‐qPCR = 2.3 × log 10 ( N N 0 ) k genome = L total L amp × k RT‐qPCR = L total × k normalized where k RT‑qPCR and k genome are the apparent degradation reaction rate constants of the RT-qPCR target regions and the entire genomes of the viruses, respectively, in L·mg –1 ·s –1 ; L amp is the size of the qPCR amplicons, i.e., 83 bases for MS2 and 280 bases (140 base pairs) for Φ6 in this study; L total is the size of the entire genome, i.e., 3600 bases for MS2 and 26 800 bases (13 400 base pairs) for Φ6; k normalized is the normalized rate constant in L·mg –1 ·s –1 ·base –1 ; C·T is the cumulative exposure to oxidants (in mg·s·L –1 ); N 0 is the initial concentration of genome (copies·mL –1 ); and N is the genome concentration after certain exposure to oxidants (copies·mL –1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the viral inactivation mechanisms, viral genome damage during disinfection by PFA, PAA, and free chlorine, was measured by RT-qPCR following previous methods (Text S5). 50,51 The rate constant for genome damage was calculated (eqs 1 and 2), and the reaction of the whole genome was predicted through the extrapolation of the RT-qPCR results (eq 2). 36…”
Section: Genome Degradation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, natural polymers, especially polysaccharide-based superabsorbent polymers, have garnered significant attention due to their non-toxicity and good hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability compared with synthetic polymers. The main materials used for superabsorbent polymers are natural polymers, such as cellulose [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 89 ], chitosan [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 90 ], starch [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 91 ], proteins [ 9 , 58 , 59 , 60 ], amino acids [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 92 ], and alginate [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 93 ].…”
Section: Superabsorbent Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability compared with synthetic polymers. The main materials used for superabsorbent polymers are natural polymers, such as cellulose [48][49][50]89], chitosan [51][52][53]90], starch [54][55][56][57]91], proteins [9,[58][59][60], amino acids [61][62][63]92], and alginate [64][65][66]93].…”
Section: Common Natural Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%