2014
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31829ea2c8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visante Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of Morphologic Changes After Deep Sclerectomy With Intraoperative Mitomycin-C and No Implant Use

Abstract: NPDS without implant placement and with intraoperative mitomycin C application seems to be an effective and well-tolerated method to reduce IOP with long-term effectiveness, casting doubt on the mandatory use of intrascleral implants in nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It informs us that the greater the dimension of intrascleral space the lower the IOP, as depicted in the scatter plots in figure 3 (The scatter plot B of figure 3 in the article seems to be wrongly labeled). 1 Their finding is consistent with a report by Mavrakanas et al 7 having a stronger correlation (Pr0.001, r = 0.626) compared with the current study (P = 0.006, r = À0.389, for maximum intrascleral space height) who stated that "A positive inverse correlation was found between the IOP and the height of the intrascleral filtration bleb (Pr0.001, r = 0.626)." These findings are important to note, because intrascleral space dimensions would be larger with implant placement.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It informs us that the greater the dimension of intrascleral space the lower the IOP, as depicted in the scatter plots in figure 3 (The scatter plot B of figure 3 in the article seems to be wrongly labeled). 1 Their finding is consistent with a report by Mavrakanas et al 7 having a stronger correlation (Pr0.001, r = 0.626) compared with the current study (P = 0.006, r = À0.389, for maximum intrascleral space height) who stated that "A positive inverse correlation was found between the IOP and the height of the intrascleral filtration bleb (Pr0.001, r = 0.626)." These findings are important to note, because intrascleral space dimensions would be larger with implant placement.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…We would like to make a few comments: (1) The authors wrote that "All these data suggested that the use of scleral implants after NPDS may not be necessary to maintain an open intrascleral space over a long time." However, we need to ask the right question of why implant is used after nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy?…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, we need to ask the right question of why implant is used after nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy? 1 Their finding is consistent with a report by Mavrakanas et al 7 having a stronger correlation (Pr0.001, r = 0.626) compared with the current study (P = 0.006, r = À0.389, for maximum intrascleral space height) who stated that "A positive inverse correlation was found between the IOP and the height of the intrascleral filtration bleb (Pr0.001, r = 0.626)." During the period of its existence in the intrascleral space, the implant bridges the maximum period of scarring postoperatively.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We would like to make a few comments: (1) The authors wrote that "All these data suggested that the use of scleral implants after NPDS may not be necessary to maintain an open intrascleral space over a long time." We would like to make a few comments: (1) The authors wrote that "All these data suggested that the use of scleral implants after NPDS may not be necessary to maintain an open intrascleral space over a long time."…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of correlation between AS-OCT variables and IOP differs from data reported by other authors [23,46] . The lack of an inverse correlation between filtering bleb wall thickness and IOP could be due to the spacer effect of the PRGF clot.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%