on "Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography analysis of morphologic changes after deep sclerectomy with intraoperative mitomycin-C and no implant use." We would like to make a few comments:(1) The authors wrote that "All these data suggested that the use of scleral implants after NPDS may not be necessary to maintain an open intrascleral space over a long time." However, we need to ask the right question of why implant is used after nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy? The use of implant in deep sclerectomy (DS) is not primarily to maintain an open intrascleral space over a long time, but to enhance its success rates by serving as a space maintainer 2 during the time of maximal healing that occurs in the early months after surgery. During the period of its existence in the intrascleral space, the implant bridges the maximum period of scarring postoperatively. 3 Furthermore, Shaarawy et al 4 showed that DS with collagen implant (DSCI) had a better complete success rate (< 21 mm Hg without medication) than DS alone (63.4% in DSCI vs. 34.6% in DS; P = 0.003). The mean number of medication per patient was reduced from 2.1 (SD = 0.8) to 0.4 (SD = 0.6) in the DSCI group (P = 0.001). This is corroborated by another report from Sanchez et al, 5 where complete and qualified success rates were better when the collagen implant was used (Log-Rank test: P = 0.0002 and 0.033 for complete and qualified success, respectively). The need for postoperative glaucoma medications was significantly lower when the collagen implant was used (0.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7 medication per patient in the DSCI and DS respectively, Student t test: P = 0.0038). They also reported that there was significantly less bleb fibrosis when the collagen implant was used (2% and 11% in DSCI and DS, respectively, P = 0.029). Moreover, use of implant such as collagen decreases the risk of adhesion between the trabeculoDescemetic membrane and the scleral tissue by virtue of its space-occupying property and its presence (usually for 6 to 9mo 6 ) creates an inward indentation of the scleral bed providing more room. This reduction in adhesion and provision of extra room makes goniopuncture more feasible in the postoperative period.(2) The very fact that they "found a significant negative correlation between the IOP level at the time of AS-OCT examinations and the maximum anteroposterior length, maximum height, and volume of that intrascleral space" is telling. It informs us that the greater the dimension of intrascleral space the lower the IOP, as depicted in the scatter plots in figure 3 (The scatter plot B of figure 3 in the article seems to be wrongly labeled). 1 Their finding is consistent with a report by Mavrakanas et al 7 having a stronger correlation (Pr0.001, r = 0.626) compared with the current study (P = 0.006, r = À0.389, for maximum intrascleral space height) who stated that "A positive inverse correlation was found between the IOP and the height of the intrascleral filtration bleb (Pr0.001, r = 0.626)." These findings are important to note, b...