1980
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(80)90036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscerosomatic convergence and responses to intestinal distension of neurons at the junction of midbrain and posterior thalamus in the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous electrophysiological studies, nociceptive responses have been recorded in the posterior thalamic group (for review see Albe-Fessard et al, 1985;Poggio and Mountcastle, 1960;Carstens and Yokota, 1980;Guilbaud et al, 1980;Peschanski et al, 1981), the intralaminar thalamic nuclei , the medial thalamic nuclei (Dostrovsky and Guilbaud, 1990), the SPFPC (Dong et al, 1978), and the lateral habenular nucleus (Benabid and Jeaugey, 1989). Most of the neurons in the intralaminar nuclei respond exclusively to noxious somatic and visceral stimuli (Peschanski et al, 1981;.…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In previous electrophysiological studies, nociceptive responses have been recorded in the posterior thalamic group (for review see Albe-Fessard et al, 1985;Poggio and Mountcastle, 1960;Carstens and Yokota, 1980;Guilbaud et al, 1980;Peschanski et al, 1981), the intralaminar thalamic nuclei , the medial thalamic nuclei (Dostrovsky and Guilbaud, 1990), the SPFPC (Dong et al, 1978), and the lateral habenular nucleus (Benabid and Jeaugey, 1989). Most of the neurons in the intralaminar nuclei respond exclusively to noxious somatic and visceral stimuli (Peschanski et al, 1981;.…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Perhaps most importantly, and most strikingly different from the MGv, the MGm is highly multimodal, consistent with its diverse inputs. In addition to its major auditory character, cells in the MGm respond to tactile, thermal, nociceptive, vestibular and visceral stimulation (Blum et al, 1979; Brinkhus et al, 1979; Carstens and Yokota, 1980; Khorevin, 1980; Love and Scott, 1969; Wepsic, 1966). Single neurons in the MGm exhibit convergence of tone and footshock stimulation (Bordi and LeDoux, 1994a, 1994b).…”
Section: Relevant Anatomy and Physiology Of The Medial Geniculate mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the most studied function of the medial geniculate nucleus (MGN) is its role in passing auditory information from the inferior colliculus to the auditory cortex (Budinger et al, 2000; Crippa et al, 2010; Geiser et al, 2012; Horie et al, 2013; Jones, 1985; Llano and Sherman, 2008; Mesulam and Pandya, 1973; Monakow, 1914; Poliak, 1926; Redies et al, 1989; Ryugo and Killackey, 1974; Tunturi, 1946; Walker, 1937). However, there is also evidence the MGN has a far broader role in multisensory processing (Blum et al, 1979; Brinkhus et al, 1979; Carstens and Yokota, 1980; Love and Scott, 1969; Wepsic, 1966). Further, there is growing evidence that the MGN does not operate in isolation from other posterior thalamic nuclei (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%