1988
DOI: 10.1299/kikaia.54.1151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visco-plastic behavior of stainless steel SUS 304 under cyclic loading at room temperature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of those studies focused on the ratchetting deformation produced in pure fatigue loading condition. In terms of ratchetting deformation under creep-fatigue loading, Yoshida et al (1989) and Yoshida (1990Yoshida ( , 1995 had conducted some tests for 304 stainless steel at room temperature and 923 K, and reported the effect of stress rate, peak stress hold and stress ratio on the ratchetting deformation. Their results indicated that the evolutions of ratchetting strain for different stress ratios and a constant peak stress hold were almost the same when the stress ratio was larger than À0.4 (the static creep test can be referred to as experiment with stress ratio of 1), which is similar to our experimental results except for the case of static creep as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ratchetting Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most of those studies focused on the ratchetting deformation produced in pure fatigue loading condition. In terms of ratchetting deformation under creep-fatigue loading, Yoshida et al (1989) and Yoshida (1990Yoshida ( , 1995 had conducted some tests for 304 stainless steel at room temperature and 923 K, and reported the effect of stress rate, peak stress hold and stress ratio on the ratchetting deformation. Their results indicated that the evolutions of ratchetting strain for different stress ratios and a constant peak stress hold were almost the same when the stress ratio was larger than À0.4 (the static creep test can be referred to as experiment with stress ratio of 1), which is similar to our experimental results except for the case of static creep as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ratchetting Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the effects of time-dependent factors, such as stressing rate and stress hold time on ratchetting behavior of the materials have been discussed 0167-6636/$ -see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.03.002 by Yoshida et al (1989), Yoshida (1990Yoshida ( , 1995, Yang et al (2003), Kang (2006), Kang et al (2006). However, to the author's knowledge, there is no physical argument on the origin of ratchetting under cyclic loadings with various hold times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ratchetting taking place under uniaxial cyclic loading with nonzero mean stress is referred to as uniaxial ratchetting, which is most fundamental and has been studied in many works. For 304 and 316 stainless steels, uniaxial ratchetting experiments have been reported by Yoshida et al (1988), Chaboche and Nouailhas (1989), Krempl (1989, 1990), Yoshida (1990), Sasaki and Ishikawa (1993), Delobelle (1993), Delobelle et al (1995), Haupt and Schinke (1996), and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ratcheting can be defined as the directional and progressive accumulation of strain under asymmetrical stress-controlled cycling (Jiang and Zhang, 2008). To understand this phenomenon, several research works have been carried out at uniaxial cyclic loading with non-zero mean stress for 304 and 316 stainless steel at room and high temperatures has been reported by (Yoshida et al , 1988; Chaboche and Nouailhas, 1989; Ruggles and Krempl, 1989, 1990; Delobelle, 1993). Majority of available literature on ratcheting behavior pertains to studies on piping materials like SA333 (Paul et al , 2010a, 2010b, 2011a) and austenitic steels (Feaugas and Gaudin, 2004; Kang et al , 2005; Bocher et al , 2001; Yang, 2005; Paul et al , 2011b, 2012; Taleb and Cailletaud, 2011; Ray et al , 2010; Kang and Gao, 2005; Kang et al , 2002a, 2002b; Polák et al , 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%