2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/7/2325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscoelastic characterization of elliptical mechanical heterogeneities using a semi-analytical shear-wave scattering model for elastometry measures

Abstract: This paper presents a semi-analytical model of shear wave scattering by a viscoelastic elliptical structure embedded in a viscoelastic medium, and its application in the context of dynamic elastography imaging. The commonly used assumption of mechanical homogeneity in the inversion process is removed introducing a priori geometrical information to model physical interactions of plane shear waves with the confined mechanical heterogeneity. Theoretical results are first validated using the finite element method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, it may be possible to adapt ARFIRE to consider ellipsoids. Shear wave scattering by elliptical structures was previously investigated in the case of plane incident shear waves (Montagnon et al 2013). This may constitute a framework to adapt ARFIRE for future works.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, it may be possible to adapt ARFIRE to consider ellipsoids. Shear wave scattering by elliptical structures was previously investigated in the case of plane incident shear waves (Montagnon et al 2013). This may constitute a framework to adapt ARFIRE for future works.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum amplitude of shear waves was observed between 60 and 150 Hz with a peak at 100 Hz in case of phantom #1, between 100 and 200 Hz with a peak at 150 Hz for phantom #2, and between 150 and 300 Hz with a peak at 200 Hz for phantom #3. benchmark methods; however discrepancies were more significant for loss moduli. This may be explained by the small size of inclusions relative to selected wavelength, 49 which affected the estimation of displacements within mimicking lesions and more importantly the estimation of the loss modulus compared to G ′ , as also noticed in Refs. 25 and 49.…”
Section: C Viscoelasticity Measurements Versus Benchmark Valuesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, the push amplitude is not precisely known, which may result in failure of accurate reconstruction. Other global techniques such as semi-analytical approaches ( Hadj-Henni et al 2008 , Montagnon et al 2013 , 2014 , Bernard and Cloutier 2017 ) provide good results with less computational cost, but are limited to simple geometries and cannot provide elasticity maps with arbitrary heterogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%