DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSISsixties when commercial instruments became more user-friendly. About 1966, Gillham developed the TBA (10) and started the modern period of DMA. In 1971, Starita and Macosko (11) built a DMA that measured normal forces and from this came the Rheometrics Corporation. In 1976, Bohlin also developed a commercial DMA and started Bohlin Rheologia. Both instruments used torsional geometry. The early instruments were, regardless of manufacturer, difficult to use, slow, and limited in their ability to process data. In the late seventies, Murayani (12) and Read and Brown (13) wrote books on the uses of DMA for material characterization. Several thermal and rheological instrument companies introduced DMA's in the same time period, and currently most thermal and rheological vendors offer some type of DMA. Polymer Labs offered a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (DMTA using an axial geometry in the early 1980s. This was soon followed by an instrument from Du Pont. Perkin-Elmer developed a controlled stress analyzer based on their thermomechanical analyzer (TMA) technology, which was designed for increased low-end sensitivity. Triton Technologies, acquired by Mettler Toledo in 2010, developed a very easy to use design that formalized both immersion and humidity methods. On the high force end of applications, Mettler Toledo also makes an instrument capable of 40 N loads and both Gabo and MetaVib work exclusively in high load instruments. Small vendors include Hitachi, Bosch, and others. The competition between vendors has led to easier to use, faster, and less expensive instruments. The revolution in computer technology, which has so affected the laboratory, changed the latter, and DMA of all types became more user-friendly as computers and software evolved. This movement to easier to use instruments has led to more use in quality control and the development of ASTM standards (14).