2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscoelastic properties of the central region of porcine temporomandibular joint disc in shear stress-relaxation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the dynamic shear and compressive moduli of the mandibular condylar cartilage were increased nonlinearly with increasing frequency irrespective of the strain amplitude (25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Furthermore, it is accepted that the curves with the experimental top and bottom stresses in cyclic loading are close or similar to the theoretical stressrelaxation curves according to the quasi-linear viscoelastic theory (30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the dynamic shear and compressive moduli of the mandibular condylar cartilage were increased nonlinearly with increasing frequency irrespective of the strain amplitude (25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Furthermore, it is accepted that the curves with the experimental top and bottom stresses in cyclic loading are close or similar to the theoretical stressrelaxation curves according to the quasi-linear viscoelastic theory (30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Furthermore, dynamic shear behaviors of the TMJ disc and condylar cartilage are anisotropic (8,(33)(34)(35) (see Appendix 1). Under dynamic shear in the antero-posterior direction, a storage modulus (G') of about 1.0-1.5 MPa and a loss modulus (G") of about 0.2-0.3 MPa were found in the TMJ disc (8,32,33), while a storage modulus of 1.5-2.0 MPa and a loss modulus of 0.4-0.5 MPa were in the mandibular condylar cartilage (34,35). The dynamic shear modulus was approximately 3-5 times smaller in the medio-lateral direction than in the antero-posterior direction, which means that the TMJ disc and mandibular condylar cartilage exhibit weak in the masio-lateral shear compared to in the antero-posterior shear.…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the antero-posterior direction, the stretch modulus of the central zone in the TMJ disc is much lower than in the anterior and posterior bands (Teng et al, 1991). In the mediolateral directions, the compression modulus of the central part is 2-3 times larger than in its periphery (Beek et al, 2001). Additionally, the anisotropic collagen fibres intercalate with each other, presenting a net-like structure with porosity.…”
Section: Structure Properties Of the Ecmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaffold-based tissue engineering TMJ disc disc can be one tenth of its compression modulus (Barrientos et al, 2019). Tissue damage may be mainly related to long-term repeated tensile and shear stress (Iatridis and ap Gwynn, 2004).…”
Section: The Role Of Mechanical Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, stress relaxation is conducted by applying a fixed strain and measuring the time-dependent stress reduction. 23,24 Stress relaxation as a standard test method has been frequently applied for determining the rheological behaviors of various soft tissues such as human heart valve, 25 brain tissue, 26,27 human skin, 28 bone tissue engineering scaffolds, 29 Spinal cord, 30 central region of porcine temporomandibular joint disc, 31 and rat brain tissue. 32 Therefore, in the present work in order to study the mechanical response of the heart muscle, using the widely accepted stress-relaxation test is beneficial to characterize the mechanical elements of the standard linear solid model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%