An important question for the Carbon Capture, Storage, and Utility program is "can we adequately predict the CO 2 plume migration?" The Sleipner project in the Norwegian North Sea provides more time-lapse seismic monitoring data than any other sites for tracking CO 2 plume development, but significant uncertainties still exist for some reservoir parameters. In order to simulate CO 2 plume migration and assess model uncertainties, we applied two multi-phase compositional simulators to the Sleipner Benchmark model for the uppermost layer (Layer 9) of the Utsira Sand and calibrated our model against the time-lapsed seismic monitoring data at the site from 1999 to 2010. Approximate match with the observed plume was achieved by introducing lateral permeability anisotropy, CH 4 in the CO 2 stream, and adjusting reservoir temperatures. Model-predicted gas saturation, thickness of the CO 2 accumulation, and CO 2 solubility in brine-none of them used as calibration metrics-were all comparable with interpretations of the seismic data in the literature. Hundreds of simulations of parameter sensitivity (pressure, temperature, feeders, spill rates, relative permeability curves, and CH 4) showed that simulated plume extents are sensitive to permeability anisotropy, temperature, and CH 4 but not sensitive to the other analyzed parameters. However, adjusting a single parameter within the reported range of values would not reproduce the north-south trending CO 2 plume. It took a combination of permeability, CH 4 , and temperature adjustments to match simulated CO 2 plume with seismic monitoring data. On the other hand, even with a range of uncertain modeling parameters, the predicted fate of CO 2 fell within a narrow band, ~93±2% structural/hydrodynamic trapping and ~7±2% solubility trapping. The calibrated model is not unique. Other possibilities for reproducing the elongated plume such 3/11/2016 as a slight tilting of the caprock surface to the south and subtle geological features in the Layer 9 were not experimented with in this study, but are worthy of exploration for future studies. While it appears that we were able to reproduce the north-south elongated CO 2 plume, which is a modest improvement over previous models, the adjustments of parameters need to be verified with new observations.