1965
DOI: 10.2514/3.55179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscous, Radiating Shock Layer about a Blunt Body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have highlighted the importance of accounting for the self-absorption on the shock layer even when the wall heat transfer is dominated by convection [37][38][39]. First, radiative emission and self-absorption can decrease the magnitude of the convective fluxes [38] and influence the shock stand-off distance when coupled strongly with ablating flows [39]. In this study the finite volume radiation model (which is a conservative variant of the discrete ordinates method) was employed to estimate (−∇ ⋅ ).…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Calculations and The Effect Of Trimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have highlighted the importance of accounting for the self-absorption on the shock layer even when the wall heat transfer is dominated by convection [37][38][39]. First, radiative emission and self-absorption can decrease the magnitude of the convective fluxes [38] and influence the shock stand-off distance when coupled strongly with ablating flows [39]. In this study the finite volume radiation model (which is a conservative variant of the discrete ordinates method) was employed to estimate (−∇ ⋅ ).…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Calculations and The Effect Of Trimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 shows the results of a cursory analysis for an Apollo-sized vehicle travelling at 18 km/sec at the altitude corresponding to a 10 # deceleration on the undershoot trajectory for the stagnation point. Obviously, the energy depletion is important at the higher radiation levels, and according to Seiff would be even more important off the stagnation point, as the analysis of Hoshizaki (11) indicates. However, it should be noted' 8 ' that energy fraction for optimum configurations is not changed from what had been predicted in refs.…”
Section: Radiative Heating Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%