1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.00249.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visibility of objects in computer simulations of noisy micrographs

Abstract: Thresholds of visibility for objects in images with random pixel noise are predicted in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio. From trials with volunteers marking test images, we determined visibility thresholds of objects obscured by random pixel noise. The test images had objects with a variety of simple shapes and relatively little internal structure. Aside from the noise, the background of the test images was smooth and featureless. We extend the threshold signal-to-noise ratio measurements of Rose and others… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The MDAs of 131 I and 124 I were therefore determined for the different reconstruction methods. The MDA of 131 I was higher for SC 6i8s reconstruction than for no-SC 6i8s reconstruction for some sphere sizes (10,22, and 28 mm). MDAs were not necessarily lower for images obtained with scatter correction, possibly because of the additional noise introduced in the reconstruction by the scatter projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MDAs of 131 I and 124 I were therefore determined for the different reconstruction methods. The MDA of 131 I was higher for SC 6i8s reconstruction than for no-SC 6i8s reconstruction for some sphere sizes (10,22, and 28 mm). MDAs were not necessarily lower for images obtained with scatter correction, possibly because of the additional noise introduced in the reconstruction by the scatter projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A K 2D threshold of 8 was used to determine MDA (22,23). MDA was defined as the activity at which the K 2D -versus-activity curve intersected with the threshold.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the autoscaling may be applied with no record kept of the actual scaling factor. While such an autoscaling operation for compositional mapping may be expedient, the loss of true intensity information clearly eliminates any possibility of determining a k-value map or of performing any other mathematical operations that require true counts, such as analyzing the signal-to-noise ratio (Bright et al, 1998). With arbitrarily ap-plied scaling, there is simply no direct way to know if a certain gray level corresponds to a major, minor, or trace constituent in a single map.…”
Section: Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the information regarding the image and alteration products is encoded in the top ~100-200 nm of the plate [9,10], and the primary x-ray signal penetrates many micrometers into the Ag coating and Cu bulk, the resultant chemical signal of interest is weak. Poor signal quality, on the order of less than 10 counts per second in the spectral region of interest (ROI), generally results in an unsatisfactorily noisy image [11]. In this case, the signal is dominated by the variance inherent to a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%