Visible Identities

Abstract

In the heated debates over identity politics, few theorists have looked carefully at the conceptualizations of identity assumed by all sides. Drawing on both philosophical sources as well as theories and empirical studies in the social sciences, this book makes a strong case that identities are not like special interests, nor are they doomed to oppositional politics, nor do they inevitably lead to conformism, essentialism, or reductive approaches to judging others. Identities are historical formations and their political implications are open to interpretation. But identities such as race and gender also have a powerful visual and material aspect that eliminativists and social constructionists often underestimate. This book analyses the political and philosophical worries about identity and argues that these worries are neither supported by the empirical data nor grounded in realistic understandings of what identities are. The book develops a more realistic characterization of identity in general through combining phenomenological approaches to embodiment with hermeneutic concepts of the interpretive horizon. Besides addressing the general contours of social identity, the book develops an account of the material infrastructure of gendered identity, compares and contrasts gender identities with racialized ones, and explores the experiential aspects of racial subjectivity for both whites and non-whites. In several chapters the book looks specifically at Latino identity as well, including its relationship to concepts of race, the specific forms of anti-Latino racism, and the politics of mestizo or hybrid identity.

Biased against Debiasing: On the Role of (Institutionally Sponsored) Self-Transformation in the Struggle against Prejuice

“…I think this point is basically right. In a similar vein, the pervasive, racially biased habits explored by theorists such as Allen (2004), Alcoff (2006), and Sullivan (2006) and are far richer and more complex-psychologically, socially, historically, and symbolically-than those involved in Kawakami's debiasing procedures. My response is to invoke an analogy with linguistic fluency (Madva 2012).…”

The naturalistic turn in feminist theory: A Marxist-realist contribution

“…1997, 1999). Thereby she conflates the existentially necessary powerlessness that stems from our relational nature and the powerlessness stemming from man-made oppressive systems (Alcoff, 2006). Such vagueness undermines any serious attempt to imagine what a feminist future may look like and instead locks us inside an unproductive wavering between pessimism and utopianism.…”

Turtles All the Way: Simulacra and Resistance to Simulacra in Indigenous Teachers’ Discussion of Indigenous Children’s Literature

“…If I named in advance who could participate in the study (that is, by addressing the letter of consent to White teachers), I would be precluding the kinds of stories that teachers could tell about themselves, using my own predetermined notions from an identity politics perspective (Alcoff, 2006). The study was therefore made open to all teachers who had an interest in discussing multicultural children's literature.…”