2014
DOI: 10.1002/rob.21532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision‐based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping in Changing Outdoor Environments

Abstract: For robots operating in outdoor environments, a number of factors, including weather, time of day, rough terrain, high speeds, and hardware limitations, make performing vision‐based simultaneous localization and mapping with current techniques infeasible due to factors such as image blur and/or underexposure, especially on smaller platforms and low‐cost hardware. In this paper, we present novel visual place‐recognition and odometry techniques that address the challenges posed by low lighting, perceptual change… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This long‐term place recognition approach is exemplified by SeqSLAM (Milford & Wyeth, ), which matches sequences of images acquired under extremely varied conditions, matching from day to night, rain to sunshine. SeqSLAM has been extended to include better handling of different vehicle speeds (Pepperell, Corke, & Milford, ) and match‐verification (Milford, Vig, Scheirer, & Cox, ). Similarly, Naseer, Spinello, Burgard, & Stachniss () robustly select matches under severe seasonal changes using the data‐association graph for full datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This long‐term place recognition approach is exemplified by SeqSLAM (Milford & Wyeth, ), which matches sequences of images acquired under extremely varied conditions, matching from day to night, rain to sunshine. SeqSLAM has been extended to include better handling of different vehicle speeds (Pepperell, Corke, & Milford, ) and match‐verification (Milford, Vig, Scheirer, & Cox, ). Similarly, Naseer, Spinello, Burgard, & Stachniss () robustly select matches under severe seasonal changes using the data‐association graph for full datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the generality of the automatic coverage selection process, we performed a second set of experiments with the local feature-based technique previously described as the localization front-end. Due to the extremely challenging appearance change present in much of the Nearmaps datasets, the feature-based approach only produced competitive performance on datasets 4, 7a and 7b, a result mirroring what has been observed in a range of other feature-based localization systems [46]. However, for these environments where the underlying front-end was functional, the calibra- Fig.…”
Section: Automatic Coverage Selection Evaluation Using a Feature-bmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…shifts and is similar to the regional-MAC descriptor outlined in [45] or the patch verification technique described in [46] IV. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP This section describes the experimental setup, including the dataset acquisition and key parameter values.…”
Section: A Optimal Coverage Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RatSLAM algorithm draws upon the current understanding of spatial encoding in rat brains to perform learning and recall of maps [5,6,7]. The structure of the RatSLAM system is shown in Fig.1.…”
Section: Ratslammentioning
confidence: 99%