2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: The “residual vision activation theory”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
140
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 269 publications
13
140
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Upper panels: To assess the visual fields with high-resolution computer-based perimetry, suprathreshold stimuli were presented at random locations, from which simple detection charts were created. White indicates intact visual field sector; black, regions of absolute blindness; and gray, areas where response accuracy is inconsistent, which are known as areas of residual vision 6 or relative defects.…”
Section: Within-group Analysis Of Detection Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Upper panels: To assess the visual fields with high-resolution computer-based perimetry, suprathreshold stimuli were presented at random locations, from which simple detection charts were created. White indicates intact visual field sector; black, regions of absolute blindness; and gray, areas where response accuracy is inconsistent, which are known as areas of residual vision 6 or relative defects.…”
Section: Within-group Analysis Of Detection Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Furthermore, vision loss after visual system damage can spontaneously recover in animals 26,27 and patients, 28 and stimulating visual field borders in patients with cortical or optic nerve lesions improves detection accuracy and enlarges visual fields, 19,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] which are stable and improve activities of daily living. 29,37,38 Evidence also indicates that areas of residual vision (ARVs) contain fibers spared by the lesion that can activate the plastic cortex 6 as suggested by the following observations: (1) 10%…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the scotoma size does not always match well with the subjective vision loss, as measured by vision-related quality of life questionnaires [4,22], other factors than scotoma size may contribute to the patients subjective estimates of visual functions and the perceptual impairment in the seeing field may offer a possible explanation for this (for a discussion of the ''mismatchproblem'', see [4]). …”
Section: Clinical Relevance Of the Intact Field Perceptual Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%