2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision servoing of robot systems using piecewise continuous controllers and observers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be easily noticed that the proposed observer estimated the non-delayed continuous system state as accurately as expected, while the Chain observer is strongly affected by the fasting variation of the time delays values which were defined as observation accumulation errors in [20]. The results are that the Gaussian measurement noise is added to the disturbance k µ with time-varying delay, and the effect of k µ is attenuated by the chosen small value of ε as stated in equation (21). As expected, the results in Figure 8 show that the proposed observer under the effect of the Gaussian measurement noise estimated the non-delayed continuous state to the acceptable accuracy level and provided better performance than the Chain observer.…”
Section: The Time-varying Delay With Measurement Noisementioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be easily noticed that the proposed observer estimated the non-delayed continuous system state as accurately as expected, while the Chain observer is strongly affected by the fasting variation of the time delays values which were defined as observation accumulation errors in [20]. The results are that the Gaussian measurement noise is added to the disturbance k µ with time-varying delay, and the effect of k µ is attenuated by the chosen small value of ε as stated in equation (21). As expected, the results in Figure 8 show that the proposed observer under the effect of the Gaussian measurement noise estimated the non-delayed continuous state to the acceptable accuracy level and provided better performance than the Chain observer.…”
Section: The Time-varying Delay With Measurement Noisementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, utilizing visual data with the effect of lowering sampling rate to the controller might affect the performance and may lead to the closed loop instability [6,16]. Moreover, using visual data as a feedback signal induces time delay which corresponding to time for image acquisition, image processing, and visual data transmission [9,21]. It is worth mentioning that the time delay is the main cause of system instability [5,13,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual measurement methods based on structured light, single camera and multi-view stereo vision have been widely studied and applied [3]. Xu, et al measured with high precision for complex three-dimensional contour and reconstructed a pixel-level three-dimensional structure profile using structure light measurement system [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the theory of piecewise-continuous systems (PCSs) (Koncar & Vasseur, 2003;Wang, Vasseur, & Koncar, 2008;Wang, Kalchev, Tian, Simeonov, & Christov, 2013), a particular PCO was first proposed for inverted pendulum control systems (Wang, Vasseur, Koncar, Chamroo, & Christov, 2010). Then, a similar observer was used in visual servoing of robot systems (Wang, Vasseur, Christov, & Koncar, 2012). In this paper, the general PCO algorithm is described and state estimation error analysis is performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%