2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00263.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual acuity in 5–7‐year‐old children: individual variability and dependence on observation distance

Abstract: Accurate measurements of uncorrected binocular and monocular visual acuity were performed in 65 children aged 5-7 years at five viewing distances in the range 0.5-5.0 m by means of the test charts containing widely spaced E stimuli in four orientations. It was found that, in most children of this age, visual acuity (V) changed with test distance, as had been reported previously with older subjects. Visual acuity could be considered as practically independent of observation distance (Vmax-Vmin Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acuity is a critical measure of visual function for preschool vision screening (Simons, 1996;Cotter et al, 2015), clinical eye care (Donahue & Baker, 2016), and research (Tsirlin, Colpa, Goltz, & Wong, 2015;Guo et al, 2016). Current acuity measurements are limited by test-retest variability (Beck et al, 2003;Rozhkova, Podugolnikova, & Vasiljeva, 2005), patient's familiarity with letters, the ease or difficulty with which individual letters may be recognized (Strong & Woo, 1985;Ferris et al, 1993;Alexander et al, 1997), and for picture optotypes, copyright limitations. In this study, we report the introduction of an open-access set of unique pictograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acuity is a critical measure of visual function for preschool vision screening (Simons, 1996;Cotter et al, 2015), clinical eye care (Donahue & Baker, 2016), and research (Tsirlin, Colpa, Goltz, & Wong, 2015;Guo et al, 2016). Current acuity measurements are limited by test-retest variability (Beck et al, 2003;Rozhkova, Podugolnikova, & Vasiljeva, 2005), patient's familiarity with letters, the ease or difficulty with which individual letters may be recognized (Strong & Woo, 1985;Ferris et al, 1993;Alexander et al, 1997), and for picture optotypes, copyright limitations. In this study, we report the introduction of an open-access set of unique pictograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%