ABSTRACT. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). CTCA and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were performed in 100 consecutive patients (42 women, 58 men; mean age 64.4¡9.4 years; age range 39-87 years). In QCA, stenoses were quantified with dedicated software, whereas in CTCA, stenosis severity was assessed with an electronic caliper tool: stenoses were graded in 10% steps and assigned as either a calcified or non-calcified lesion. Vessel attenuation in the left main (LMA) and the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) were measured and correlated with differences in quantifications of stenosis grade between QCA and CTCA. A total of 113 coronary stenoses were detected by both methods (94 significant and 19 nonsignificant); 52 stenoses were rated as non-calcified and 61 as calcified lesions. The mean difference between QCA and quantitative CTCA grading was 5.1¡16.9% (range 227 to 46%) overall; 1.9¡14.2% (range 227 to 38%) for non-calcified lesions and 7.8¡18.6% (range 223 to 46%) for calcified lesions. Mean vessel attenuation was 362¡76 HU (range 191-584 HU) in the LMA and 333¡81 HU (range 162-564 HU) in the RCA. Attenuation did not significantly correlate with differences in QCA and CTCA gradings, neither overall nor for calcified or non-calcified lesions. When 64-slice CTCA is used, coronary vessel attenuation had no impact on the quantitative grading of stenoses. 64-slice CT has been shown to reliably detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. For clinical decision-making, exact quantification of lesion severity can be important [12]. However, the quantification of coronary artery stenoses by CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is subjected to relatively large limits of agreement compared to the clinical reference standard, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) [2,3,[13][14][15]. It has been hypothesised that coronary vessel attenuation affects the accuracy of quantitative CTCA [16][17][18]. Several factors related to the contrast material regimen, such as the type and iodine concentration of the contrast material [18], the technique for bolus timing [17], and the injection volume and rate [19], have been shown to affect the attenuation of coronary arteries. Furthermore, current CTCA protocols [1-11] do not adapt to the individual patient's body mass index or to the individual's cardiac output, although these parameters may contribute to vessel attenuation [20][21][22][23]. As a consequence, attenuation in CTCA has been shown to vary strongly [17,18,22,23] and the ideal attenuation remains undefined.The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative CTCA.
Methods and materialsPatients A total of 100 consecutive patients (42 women and 58 men; mean age 64.4¡9.4 years; age range 39-87 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 22.0¡3.5; BMI range 12.8-31.4) underwent QCA and CTCA and were prospectively enrolled in the present...