2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0512-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a software tool for quantitative coronary artery analysis of computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-QCA) in comparison with invasive coronary angiography with quantitative analysis (CAG-QCA) as standard of reference. Two radiologists reviewed the CT angiography data sets (Siemens Sensation 64) of 25 patients, grading coronary artery stenoses visually and with a software tool (Circulation, Siemens). Twenty-three data sets with sufficient image quality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative assessment of coronary stenoses has been shown to have relatively large limits of agreement when 16-slice CTCA [13,14] and 64-slice CTCA are used [3,27]. Coronary vessel attenuation is known to vary widely in different CTCA examinations [17,18,22,23], and might affect the accuracy of stenosis quantification by CTCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative assessment of coronary stenoses has been shown to have relatively large limits of agreement when 16-slice CTCA [13,14] and 64-slice CTCA are used [3,27]. Coronary vessel attenuation is known to vary widely in different CTCA examinations [17,18,22,23], and might affect the accuracy of stenosis quantification by CTCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few authors have assessed the computerised quantification of coronary artery stenosis using commercially available software [12,13]. In a later study by Busch et al [12], quantitative assessment of CTA achieved a high PPV of 89%, whereas the visual assessment revealed a PPV of only 53%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to automatic detection of the centreline of coronary arteries within 3-dimensional CT datasets [10,11], recent computerbased segmentation and quantification systems also permits the computerised estimation of the percent diameter stenosis. The computerised (i.e., software-assisted) quantification of stenosis degree is suspected to be an important factor in eliminating observer dependency and reducing the variability of MDCT [12]. However, there are few reports concerning the diagnostic performance of computerised quantification [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of coronary stenosis is manually calculated by subtracting vessel diameter at the site of maximal stenosis from the mean of the vessel reference segment diameters (proximal and distal references) and then dividing the difference by the mean of the vessel reference segment diameters on curved MPR and cross-sectional image (Fig 22). Recent cardiac-vessel analysis packages enables calculating percent stenosis automatically when the user selects the area of maximum narrowing and normal vessel proximal and distal to the stenosis (Busch et al, 2007). However, current spatial resolution of CT has not demonstrated sufficient reproducibility or accuracy in predicting findings of CAG to make such measurements a routine requirement.…”
Section: A Assessment Of Stenosis Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%