1970
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(70)90247-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual and non-visual behaviors of the rat after neonatal and adult posterior neocortical lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
7
1

Year Published

1972
1972
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the rats were trained by the classical procedure, our results were in accordance with those of numerous previous experiments (Bauer & Hughes, 1970;Bland & Cooper, 1969;Braun et aI., 1970;Lashley, 1931;Spear & Barbas, 1975;Thompson, 1969); they showed that rats after one-step damage to the visual cortex fail to relearn the H-V task. In general, our results in the brightness (B-W) and pattern (H-V) discrimination tasks using the classical training procedure in normal, unilateral, and bilateral (serially or simultaneously lesioned) rats replicated results of previous studies (Barbas & Spear, 1976;Bauer & Cooper, 1964;Bland & Cooper, 1969;Braun et al, 1970;Dru et aI., 1975aDru et aI., , 1975bGlendenning, 1972;Hamilton & Trichler, 1968;Lashley, 1931Lashley, , 1935Lashley, , 1937Le Vere & Morlock, 1973;Meyer et aI., 1966;Petrinovich & Bliss, 1966;Petrinovich & Carew, 1969;Scheff et aI., 1977;Spear & Barbas, 1975;Thompson, 1960Thompson, , 1969.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When the rats were trained by the classical procedure, our results were in accordance with those of numerous previous experiments (Bauer & Hughes, 1970;Bland & Cooper, 1969;Braun et aI., 1970;Lashley, 1931;Spear & Barbas, 1975;Thompson, 1969); they showed that rats after one-step damage to the visual cortex fail to relearn the H-V task. In general, our results in the brightness (B-W) and pattern (H-V) discrimination tasks using the classical training procedure in normal, unilateral, and bilateral (serially or simultaneously lesioned) rats replicated results of previous studies (Barbas & Spear, 1976;Bauer & Cooper, 1964;Bland & Cooper, 1969;Braun et al, 1970;Dru et aI., 1975aDru et aI., , 1975bGlendenning, 1972;Hamilton & Trichler, 1968;Lashley, 1931Lashley, , 1935Lashley, , 1937Le Vere & Morlock, 1973;Meyer et aI., 1966;Petrinovich & Bliss, 1966;Petrinovich & Carew, 1969;Scheff et aI., 1977;Spear & Barbas, 1975;Thompson, 1960Thompson, , 1969.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…1965), or else abolished or seriously retarded it (e.g., Bauer & Hughes, 1970;Bland & Cooper, 1970). The results of Experiment i indicated that neither proposition may be correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, differences in visual behaviour between infant-operated animals and normals have been reported. Although Tsang (1937) found that the rat's visual form perception was less impaired by early than by late striate damage, more recent evidence (Bauer & Hughes, 1970;Bland & Cooper, 1970) indicates that rats operated on in infancy do not learn a horizontal us vertical striation discrimination within double the number of trials taken by normals. Bauer and Hughes (1970) suggest that their findings differ from those of earlier studies with the cat, not because of differences in the size of lesions (which were extensive in both the Bauer and Hughes and the Bland and Cooper studies), but rather because they studied a different species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While extensive lesions in the striate and extrastriate cortex eliminate normal performance on visual pattern discrimination tasks regardess of age at time of surgery (in rats: Bauer & Hughes, 1970;Thompson, 1970;and cats: Doty, 1973), the remaining tectothalamocortical system may eventually allow solution of visual discrimination tasks if relevant luminosity cues are available (in rats: Bauer & Cooper, 1964;and cats: Cornwell & Overman, 1981). The geniculocortical and tecto-thalamocortical systems are not functionally redundant; however, in certain testing situations the latter system seems capable of functionally compensating for damage to the former.…”
Section: Does Functional Redundancy Underwrite Behavioral Sparing?mentioning
confidence: 99%