2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual and phonological similarity effects in verbal immediate serial recall: A test with kanji materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
114
6
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
20
114
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Baddeley, Lewis & Vallar, 1984;Murray, 1965), but not of non-verbal tasks (e.g. Saito, Logie, Morita & Law, 2008). So, its difficulty depends on the task with which it is combined, not on any overall demand on the cognitive system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baddeley, Lewis & Vallar, 1984;Murray, 1965), but not of non-verbal tasks (e.g. Saito, Logie, Morita & Law, 2008). So, its difficulty depends on the task with which it is combined, not on any overall demand on the cognitive system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the overall effect of presentation modality, observed in the main analysis of the Logie et al (1996) data presented above, could well reflect the fact that visually presented material can potentially be encoded and retained in a non phonological form, which might be less effective than phonological coding for retaining serial order (Logie, Della Sala, Wynn & Baddeley, 2000;Logie et al, 2015;Saito et al, 2008). Warrington and Shallice (1972) reported that the brain-damaged patient, KF, only showed a severe verbal short-term memory deficit with auditory presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In other words, although visual presentation led to a significantly smaller absolute effect of similarity than auditory presentation, this can be entirely accounted for statistically by the fact that baseline levels of recall were smaller in the visual presentation condition as shown above. This leaves open the question of whether the smaller visual presentation effect reflects the reduced ability of visual coding to retain serial verbal order (e.g., Logie, Saito, Morita, Varma, & Norris, 2015;Saito, Logie, Morita & Law, 2008) or impaired phonological loop functioning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These, and related (Logie, Saito, Morita, Varma, & Norris, 2015;Saito, Logie, Morita, & Law, 2008) studies have produced mixed findings, with some authors arguing for domain-specific ordering of verbal vs. visuo-spatial information while accepting that these two mechanism operate on very similar principles (Logie et al, 2015;Hurlstone et al, 2014). However, the current balance of evidence appears to be in favour of at least some degree of domain-general short-term ordering of representations (see Farrell & Oberauer, 2014;Vandierendonck, 2016).…”
Section: Working Out How 21mentioning
confidence: 99%