Visual and Virtual Ethical Research : Captured Forever

Lahman, Maria K. E.; Kronauge, Cindy

doi:10.4135/9781071878750.n9

Cited by 4 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, all the authors were part of a book publication titled Social Science Research Ethics: Becoming Culturally Responsive (Lahman, 2017). In this book, an ethical stance that advances culturally responsive and relationally reflexive research ethics is forwarded.…”

Section: Research Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For some time now, researchers have been discontented with the ever-growing overreaching bureaucracy of the IRB in the United States (Lahman, 2017). Some easing of the rules seems possible with the updating of the Common Rule that guides the IRB.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are some exceptions where groups such as Native Americans have been able to create their own research guidelines due to egregious research practices in the past. The overly protective nature of the IRB has caused some scholars to accuse universities and the government of enforcing research ethics only to protect themselves (Landram as cited in Lahman, 2017) and of gross paternalization (Teman as cited in Lahman, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The countries may participate in order to obtain high-stakes research access in the areas of both doctoral degree attainment and research grants. Cross-cultural researchers report potential participants being coaxed into signing consent forms (Landram as cited in Lahman, 2017). The participants are from cultures where the form may indicate that the researcher and participant do not have trust in each other’s spoken word or may give rise to more severe reactions where the participant accuses the researcher of being part of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (Lahman, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, U.S. IRB rules already provide justification for short-form consent, verbal consent, witnessed consent, and waiver of parental/guardian consent in some cases (Lahman, 2017). In our experience, local IRB reviews have allowed researchers to use these sorts of alterations and waivers as precedents to justify their need to change some aspect of the research process to be culturally sensitive.…”

Section: Culturally Nuanced Research Ethics Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Cultural Humility, Human Research Ethics Review, and Informed Consent

Lahman

Landram

Teman³

et al. 2022

Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The United States, through research ethics review, is complicit in ethically recolonizing countries into U.S. dominant understandings. This review and consent are seen as an all-encompassing ethical understanding and a discrete, one-time experience. Drawing on personal experiences and in-depth interviews with international and domestic subculture research participants and researchers, the authors argue that the United States ethics review must move toward a nuanced understanding of human ethics review that exhibits cultural responsiveness within culturally complex research, with a focus on cultural humility. Power, gender, sexuality, and relationships between participants, researchers, and research ethics boards are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Research Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Culturally Nuanced Research Ethics Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Cultural Humility, Human Research Ethics Review, and Informed Consent

Lahman

Landram

Teman³

et al. 2022

Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Good Name: Pseudonyms in Research

Lahman

Thomas

Teman

2022

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People’s names and the places, animals, and items named by people are deeply personal and reflective of their culture and identity, yet in qualitative research, the standard is to use pseudonyms. This practice is thought to protect research participants, but when are “real” names most respectful and appropriate? How might researchers include research participants in these considerations? The purpose of this methodological article is to increase transparency and collaboration around the participant naming process, bringing much-needed attention to issues of power in the naming process in research. The authors review the literature and detail their reflexive engagement with pseudonyms; they advance issues for consideration and provide recommendations in the areas of power in participant naming, culturally responsive research, and pseudonym use with trans people and incarcerated people. Throughout the article, the authors interrupt the text with reflexive narrative interludes to share personal experiences with naming.

show abstract

Ethics review of artistic research: challenging the boundaries and appealing for care

Boothby

2023

Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2019, a new national Ethics Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten, EPM) was created in Sweden. In 2020, Sweden’s Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans Act was revised, tightening this legislation, and increasing penalties for its infraction. This article draws on empirical material generated by artistic research conducted with a norm-critical contemporary music ensemble. Two of the musicians who collaborated with this research identify as disabled. Consequently, in accordance with EPM, my artistic research was subject to mandatory ethics review. Reflecting critically on my own experience of seeking ethical approval for this artistic research project, I show how EPM’s process of ethics review enacts scientific boundary work in Sweden that privileges the interests of academic disciplines that are already well-established. As a corrective to EPM’s scientific boundary work I propose the application of an ethics of care that recognises the complex relationalities that exist between research institutions, researchers and research participants.

show abstract

Visual and Virtual Ethical Research : Captured Forever

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Cultural Humility, Human Research Ethics Review, and Informed Consent

Cultural Humility, Human Research Ethics Review, and Informed Consent

A Good Name: Pseudonyms in Research

Ethics review of artistic research: challenging the boundaries and appealing for care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About