2021
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study

Abstract: Background Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater agreement in the visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with PFP. Methods The study w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the clinicians' observations and objective analysis is probably not related to the reliability of the assessment. A clear consistency in the assessments was observed and a previous investigation reported that dynamic knee alignment can be evaluated reliably by an experienced clinician in forward lunge ( 25 ). Most likely the visual evaluation is not sensitive enough for detecting the subtle changes in movement quality that the objective analysis was able to detect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The difference between the clinicians' observations and objective analysis is probably not related to the reliability of the assessment. A clear consistency in the assessments was observed and a previous investigation reported that dynamic knee alignment can be evaluated reliably by an experienced clinician in forward lunge ( 25 ). Most likely the visual evaluation is not sensitive enough for detecting the subtle changes in movement quality that the objective analysis was able to detect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Additionally, this test was chosen because it is less physically demanding compared to commonly used jump tests. Moreover, the SLS test closely mirrors daily activities like stair ascending and descending, as highlighted by Hansen et al ( 2021) [34]. Making it more relevant for this study population, where symptoms primarily impact the quality of daily life, function, and performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%