2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual assessment of soil structure: Evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of the VESS have been highly correlated with other soil physical attributes evaluated in laboratory (Mueller et al 2009;Guimarães et al 2011;2013), as also observed in this study (Figure 1), this methodology provides only semi-quantitative information about the state of the soil physical quality (Mueller et al 2009). Thus, the VESS does not dispense the use of a laboratory method to assess soil structure.…”
Section: Structural Quality Alteration: Relations Between Visual Evalsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although the results of the VESS have been highly correlated with other soil physical attributes evaluated in laboratory (Mueller et al 2009;Guimarães et al 2011;2013), as also observed in this study (Figure 1), this methodology provides only semi-quantitative information about the state of the soil physical quality (Mueller et al 2009). Thus, the VESS does not dispense the use of a laboratory method to assess soil structure.…”
Section: Structural Quality Alteration: Relations Between Visual Evalsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The same principles have been used by Baumgartl and Köck (2004) who have described the volume changes of soil by combining theories of mechanics and hydraulic stresses. The same equation has been also used by other authors (Mouazen, Ramon, 2009;Mueller et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, understanding the dynamics of soil physical properties is improved by using soil properties (such as soil bulk density and porosity) as proposed by Horn and Kutilek (2009). Although the effects of structural changes of the soil on crop yield can be observed, this is not an easy task since the physical properties of the soil change over time and depend on their position in the soil profile (Mueller et al, 2009;Gonçalves et al, 2013;Guimarães et al, 2013;Munkholm et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that this method of soil profile analysis can be helpful in qualitative evaluation of soil management (Coulomb et al, 1993;Roger-Estrade et al, 2000b;Mueller et al, 2009;Mueller et al, 2013;Munkholm et al, 2013;Guimarães et al, 2013;Tavares Filho et al, 2014;Boizard et al, 2016). It enables researchers to establish links between soil structure and other factors, such as root development (Roger-Estrade et al, 2000a;Mentges et al, 2016), the availability and distribution of minerals (Vizier et al, 1995), and hydrodynamic characteristics (Mentges et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%