2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01630-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Breast Asymmetry Assessment with Optical-Flow Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 41 However, we established strict guidelines to mark fiducial points and mitigate subjectivity ( Figure ). Alternatively, automated algorithms, such as the one proposed by Monton et al 42 which uses an optical flow algorithm or the automated identification of fiducial points by Kawale et al, 43 may be used for unbiased symmetry assessment. It should be noted that our dataset lacks diversity in the demographics, thus the analysis may not be generalizable to non-Caucasian populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 However, we established strict guidelines to mark fiducial points and mitigate subjectivity ( Figure ). Alternatively, automated algorithms, such as the one proposed by Monton et al 42 which uses an optical flow algorithm or the automated identification of fiducial points by Kawale et al, 43 may be used for unbiased symmetry assessment. It should be noted that our dataset lacks diversity in the demographics, thus the analysis may not be generalizable to non-Caucasian populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Subjective methods are difficult to quantify in a scientific manner because, even when measurements can be taken, the involvement of the human factor can lead to disagreement between observers. 8,27 According to some previous studies, computer-generated tools might be superior to subjective human evaluations because of differences between the observers, even in cases where observers are from the medical field. [28][29][30] The introduction of computer-generated neural networks in medical science has clear advantages, as this process can be generated by an objective system that applies similar parameters in each observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24–26 Subjective methods are difficult to quantify in a scientific manner because, even when measurements can be taken, the involvement of the human factor can lead to disagreement between observers. 8,27 According to some previous studies, computer-generated tools might be superior to subjective human evaluations because of differences between the observers, even in cases where observers are from the medical field. 28–30…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further development in the objective assessment of breast asymmetry came to light with the application of convolutional neural network architecture for asymmetry recognition in mammography breast imaging data [26]. Another novel visual breast assessment method uses an optical flow algorithm in MATLAB which objectively classifies and numerically scores breast asymmetry [27]. Considering all the statistical data, 3D objective assessment has been proven to be more consistent and accurate, leading it to be a prospective replacement of subjective panel assessment in terms of aesthetic evaluation after breast conserving treatment [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%