2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
201
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
201
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCE, Garner, and other effects reflect the operation of the second system concerned with conscious visual experience. The dissociation was recently demonstrated with the Garner effect itself, using purely perceptual and purely motor tasks (Ganel & Goodale, 2003; see also Ganel, Chajut, & Algom, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The SCE, Garner, and other effects reflect the operation of the second system concerned with conscious visual experience. The dissociation was recently demonstrated with the Garner effect itself, using purely perceptual and purely motor tasks (Ganel & Goodale, 2003; see also Ganel, Chajut, & Algom, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Janczyk & Kunde, 2012;Kunde, Landgraf, Paelecke, & Kiesel, 2007). Recently, however, Ganel and Goodale (2014) extended these findings and showed that for perceptual estimations Garner interference is not limited to RTs, and is expressed in the within-subject variability of the response, which has been shown to reflect response precision (Ganel, Chajut, & Algom, 2008). In particular, the final apertures of perceptual estimations were more variable in the filtering compared to the baseline condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Additional evidence for the dissociation in the processing styles that subserve vision-for-action and vision-forperception comes from studies that demonstrated that grasping evades the effect of Weber's law (Ganel et al, 2008;Ganel, Freud, & Meiran, 2014). According to this fundamental psychophysical law, people's ability to detect changes within a given physical dimension linearly decreases with the magnitude of this dimension (Baird & Noma, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a size-discrimination task a participant might be asked to verbally report whether the length of a visually presented line (i.e., the comparator) differs from the length of a reference line. In this context, JNDs are defined statistically with the appropriate detection of a magnitude change based on an experimentally determined criterion [41]. Equation (1) represents Weber's Law, where W is the current amount of weight bearing, K is the Weber ratio, and ΔW is the JND…”
Section: Implicit Weight-shift Length-extension Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%