2022 26th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iv56949.2022.00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Collaboration - An Approach for Visual Analytical Collaborative Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows an alternative version of the UI focusing on visual analytics. The calculations and backend are the same; however, the frontend that is based on our previous works [8,28] grants the user the ability to explore the results better. The user has various filtering options seen in (2) while at the same time having a listed view seen in ( 1) that shows more information than Figure 3.…”
Section: Results Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 shows an alternative version of the UI focusing on visual analytics. The calculations and backend are the same; however, the frontend that is based on our previous works [8,28] grants the user the ability to explore the results better. The user has various filtering options seen in (2) while at the same time having a listed view seen in ( 1) that shows more information than Figure 3.…”
Section: Results Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly described using a visual system as an alternative view of the results. Visual analytics systems yield various benefits we described in our previous work [28] that impact decision-making and exploration. However, further studies must be made into our approach's impact with various frontend versions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaption process requires time and thought as it is necessary to provide meaningful recommendations that do not harm users' cognition. As described in our previous works [39,40,59], the user should not have cognition overload due to bad interaction design while being cognitively within the research process on our platform. The usability study shows deficits in our current interaction design that need to be addressed, such as a suboptimal abstract presentation, a lack of loading icons and underlying speed issues, a lack of navigation bars showing users where they are currently in the ideation process, and missing buttons and interaction functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%