2022
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2022.3203001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Comparison of Networks in VR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, McGee et al [MGM*19] state in their literature survey the importance of these cues, as 3D graph visualizations without stereoscopic/motion cues offer no benefits over 2D. Other studies [FPK*23, JJHS*22] have looked towards using Virtual Reality ( VR ) to explore the differences between 2D, 2.5D, and 3D network visualizations and found that different tasks were done more effectively using different number of dimensions. Research in other fields show mixed results in the comparison of 2D versus 3D.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, McGee et al [MGM*19] state in their literature survey the importance of these cues, as 3D graph visualizations without stereoscopic/motion cues offer no benefits over 2D. Other studies [FPK*23, JJHS*22] have looked towards using Virtual Reality ( VR ) to explore the differences between 2D, 2.5D, and 3D network visualizations and found that different tasks were done more effectively using different number of dimensions. Research in other fields show mixed results in the comparison of 2D versus 3D.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many of these can be generalised to 3D (Herman et al, 2000), work on graph layouts specifically developed for 3D is comparatively sparse (Hong and Murtagh, 2005). There are, however, observations that 3D graph visualisations can outperform established 2D visualisations such as adjacency matrices, for instance in network comparison tasks (Joos et al, 2022). It is also reported that 3D layouts can mitigate problems with edge crossings or node overlaps that are frequently found in complex 2D layouts (Kotlarek et al, 2020).…”
Section: Graph Visualisation In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This preserves key characteristics of the 2D graph and ensures a good overview over the entire network also in 3D (Kwon et al, 2016) and should therefore help users to maintain a connection to the graph on the 2D display. Although there are more "organic" 3D node-link layouts utilising more extensively immersive space as for instance presented by Kotlarek et al (2020), these layouts perform not necessarily better than 2D layouts (Joos et al, 2022). Some studies indicate that spherical layouts in VR can improve error rates and completion times for a variety of typical graph analysis tasks, such as finding common neighbours, highest degree nodes and paths, as well as recalling node locations (Kwon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Data Set and Layout Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This position was popular amongst works exploring spatial immersion by allowing users to explore multiple visualizations distributed throughout the virtual space [113]. Another scenario I observed unfixed positioning was for IA systems and visualizations where changing the visualizations' position was the primary method for changing the users' perspective [97].…”
Section: Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%