1986
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(86)90120-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual discrimination at varying distances in spanish goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One shape was randomly assigned as the correct shape, and selection of the correct shape by the goat's snout resulted in a food reward. Shape discrimination was chosen to assess cognitive function because goats have been shown to excel at this particular cognitive task (Baldwin, ; Blakeman & Friend, ; Langbein et al . , , , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One shape was randomly assigned as the correct shape, and selection of the correct shape by the goat's snout resulted in a food reward. Shape discrimination was chosen to assess cognitive function because goats have been shown to excel at this particular cognitive task (Baldwin, ; Blakeman & Friend, ; Langbein et al . , , , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goats are likely to use visual and olfactory cues to detect subtle differences between feeds and make feed choices ( 32 , 33 ). Indeed, goats, like sheep, are capable of distinguishing colors and shades of gray ( 34 ), with a visual field about 270° and a binocular field being about 45° ( 35 ). Laboratory experiments have shown that goats possess numerous cognitive capacities (e.g., foraging, navigational or social cognitive capacities, ( 36 ), including the ability to categorize feed items and recall preferred feed types and locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, that the observed superior performance of males over females is a true difference in cognitive skills in these tasks. Most of the published goat cognition studies involve subjects from a single sex [e.g., only males (91, 92), only females (18, 19, 23, 25, 28, 9395)] or both sexes but their performance is not compared (20, 21, 26, 96). In earlier object permanence studies, no sex differences were reported to our knowledge possibly partly because this comparison was not the focus in the majority of studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%