2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-009-0364-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual event recognition using decision trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever are the features, most of the works used a learning algorithm to learn the exacted features. HMMs [3], SVMs [4] and decision trees [5] were most popular in HAR.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever are the features, most of the works used a learning algorithm to learn the exacted features. HMMs [3], SVMs [4] and decision trees [5] were most popular in HAR.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common models are HMMs [12], Bayesian networks [6], context free grammars [18], and other graphical models [16]. Methods focusing on global behavior understand- ing often rely on object tracking [21,6,18].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common models are HMMs [34,38,41,55,62], Bayesian networks [12,59], context free grammars [56]. and other graphical model [36,49,57]. As for the classification stage, it is either used to recognize pre-defined patterns of activity [8,10,16,23,28,47,49,60,61] (useful for counting [16.52]) or detect anomalies by flagging everything that deviates from what has been previously learned [5,14,25,39,41,42,45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%