2002
DOI: 10.1080/10236240290025644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual feeding of fish in a turbid environment: Physical and behavioural aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
280
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
6
280
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different types of turbidity may affect behaviour in different ways. In aquatic environments, suspended sediment reduces the transmission of light through water (light attenuation), increases scattering [46] and reduces visual range [47]. Algal turbidity (as used here) can additionally act to shift the spectral composition of light towards green wavelengths [48,49], while dissolved organic matter shifts wavelengths into the longer orange/red Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of turbidity may affect behaviour in different ways. In aquatic environments, suspended sediment reduces the transmission of light through water (light attenuation), increases scattering [46] and reduces visual range [47]. Algal turbidity (as used here) can additionally act to shift the spectral composition of light towards green wavelengths [48,49], while dissolved organic matter shifts wavelengths into the longer orange/red Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since cuttlefish have large and sensitive eyes (Groeger et al, 2005), and can camouflage themselves in extremely low-light conditions (Allen et al, 2010b;Buresch et al, 2015), it is unlikely that their vision is affected much by turbid water. However, the vision of many potential fish predators may be affected by water turbidity (Utne-Palm, 2002). Cuttlefish thus may choose to resemble only nearby objects and substrates, because it is likely they are detected only when a predator is near.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abundance, fish in cut lakes had a higher feeding success on it than fish in control lakes. From an energetic perspective, turbidity could increase the energy allowed to growth by favouring prey detection and decreasing expenses due to food searching activity (Sirois & Dodson 2000a, Utne-Palm 2002, Shoji et al 2005. The increase of DOC in cut lakes may have lead to higher growth rate by favouring prey detection and lowering energy costs allocated to prey searching when feeding on Daphnia spp.…”
Section: Feeding Success and Growth Of Yoy Yellow Perch In Relation Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of DOC in cut lakes may have lead to higher growth rate by favouring prey detection and lowering energy costs allocated to prey searching when feeding on Daphnia spp. The enhancement of feeding with increasing turbidity may be explained by the higher detection of preys as well as an increase in feeding activity caused by a lowered risk of prédation (Gregory & Northcote 1993, Utne-Palm 2002, Shoji & Tanaka 2006b). …”
Section: Feeding Success and Growth Of Yoy Yellow Perch In Relation Tmentioning
confidence: 99%