Objective-To determine if glaucoma is associated with driving limitation or cessation.Design-Cross-sectional analysis within a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.Participants and Controls-One thousand one-hundred and thirty-five ever-drivers between the ages of 73 and 93 years including 70 subjects with unilateral glaucoma and 68 subjects with bilateral glaucoma.Methods-All subjects reported their driving habits during each of 4 study rounds. During the fourth and final study round, subjects were systematically assessed for the presence of glaucoma.Main Outcome Measures-Self-reported driving cessation or driving limitation, including cessation of night driving, driving less than 3,000 miles annually, or cessation of driving in unfamiliar areas.Results-Fifteen percent of subjects without glaucoma were no longer driving at the end of the cohort study compared to 21% of unilateral glaucoma subjects (p=0.2) and 41% of bilateral glaucoma subjects (p<0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that bilateral (odds ratio [OR]=2.6, p=0.002), but not unilateral (OR=1.5, p=0.3), glaucoma subjects were more likely to no longer be driving when compared to subjects without glaucoma. The odds that bilateral glaucoma subjects were no longer driving doubled for every 5 dB of visual field (VF) worsening in the better-eye (p<0.001). Driving cessation within the previous 2 years was analyzed using separate multiple regression models, and both bilateral (OR=3.6, p=0.004) and unilateral (OR=2.4, p=0.06) glaucoma subjects were more likely to stop driving over this period when compared to subjects without glaucoma. Driving cessation associated with bilateral glaucoma was present in 0.82% of the population, or 1 in every 122 individuals.Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models demonstrated driving limitations were not more frequently found amongst subjects with glaucoma than subjects without glaucoma. However, bilateral glaucoma subjects did attribute more driving limitations to difficulties with their vision than subjects without glaucoma (OR=2.2, p=0.02).