2005
DOI: 10.1348/014466504x19451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual hallucinations in psychiatric conditions: Appraisals and their relationship to distress

Abstract: Appraisals of visions predicted the distress associated with visions. 'Objective' characteristics of visions were poorer predictors of distress, and appraisals did not simply follow from the content of the vision. However, current mood may partially determine appraisals. The novel categories of distress require replication but may help to guide clinical practice. Therapeutic interventions aimed at altering appraisals may reduce distress.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this is helpful with other visual experiences is unclear, although studies show that the appraisals and beliefs should be a core target for treatment. 70,108 …”
Section: Treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this is helpful with other visual experiences is unclear, although studies show that the appraisals and beliefs should be a core target for treatment. 70,108 …”
Section: Treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work so far indicates that the appraisal of the VH is important in understanding distress. Gauntlett-Gilbert and Kuipers (2005) found that an individual's appraisal did not simply follow on from the content, frequency or duration of the VH and that if the individual's appraisal of this experience was negative then this directly predicted distress.Collerton and Dudley (2004) argued that the appraisal of the visual experience was central to understanding the distress associated with VH. Specifically, it was proposed that people would appraise the visual experience as a threat to their physical or psychological wellbeing, and that they would use Safety Seeking Behaviours (SSBs) to help manage this distress much like people with other emotional and psychotic symptoms do.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, benevolent appraisals have been associated with voice engagement, omnipotent and fearful appraisals with distress, and malevolent appraisals with voice resistance, and each of these are independent of frequency, severity, and intensity of voices (Chadwick & Birchwood, 1994;Gauntlett-Gilbert & Kuipers, 2005;Jackson, Hayward, & Cooke, 2011;Mawson, Berry, Murray, & Hayward, 2011;O'Brien & Johns, 2013;Peters, Williams, Cooke, & Kuipers, 2012). On a broader level, various studies have suggested that mental health labels such as psychosis (as an indication of 'abnormality') can facilitate negative appraisals of voices, especially when the experiences are perceived as rare or unusual (Corrigan, 2004;Mak, Poon, Pun, & Cheung, 2007).…”
Section: Hearing Voices Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%