2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual influence of shapes and semantic familiarity on human sweet sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most prominent amongst these correspondences is the association between round shapes and sweetness [2][3][4]. Round shapes have even been shown to increase participants' sensitivity for sweetness at threshold levels, compared to angular shapes [5,6]. In the realm of chocolate, people from Western cultures tend to associate chocolate with a higher cacao content (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prominent amongst these correspondences is the association between round shapes and sweetness [2][3][4]. Round shapes have even been shown to increase participants' sensitivity for sweetness at threshold levels, compared to angular shapes [5,6]. In the realm of chocolate, people from Western cultures tend to associate chocolate with a higher cacao content (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, simply adding a tasteless colorant to water can el evate or lower taste thresholds, even when participants were warned that the color is irrelevant information (review in Spence etal., 2010). Taste perception can therefore be easily manipulated by altering either appearance (Wheatley, 1973; see also Liang et al, 2013) or descriptive labels (Crum et al, 2011;Levitan et al, 2008;Yeomans et al, 2008) of foods. More interestingly, the mindset of expectations about foods and their visual presentation activate the gustatory cortices, i.e., the insula/operculum and orbitofrontal cortex, even in the absence of gustatory stimulation (Barros-Locertales et al, 2011;review in Van der Laan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Tastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the results also suggest that tastes and shapes share a 222 semantic space or a set of implicit meanings, which is initially characterized by two main 223 components. Indeed, a possibility is that these components reflect the two elements identified 224 between taste words and shapes would produce congruence effects over-and-above those 231 already reported with tastes per se (Liang et al, 2013), that is, by using linguistic taste 232 stimuli. For this purpose, we designed a task in which a larger sample of participants (in order 233 to compensate for potential hardware-related differences across participants and fewer trials, 234 e.g., Woods et al, 2015) were given congruent or incongruent instructions about the mapping 235 between taste words and shapes and were later asked to respond to shapes or taste words with 236 taste words and shapes, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 178mentioning
confidence: 96%