2008
DOI: 10.1163/156856808782713762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
139
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, subjects have a general tendency for fixating the middle of the screen irrespective of the distribution of the image features (see Tatler, 2007). Third, in art, main figurative elements often appear in a central position (Locher et al, 2007; Tyler, 2007). However, the larger distance of fixations from the image center observed for experts indicates that expertise can inhibit the center-viewing tendency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, subjects have a general tendency for fixating the middle of the screen irrespective of the distribution of the image features (see Tatler, 2007). Third, in art, main figurative elements often appear in a central position (Locher et al, 2007; Tyler, 2007). However, the larger distance of fixations from the image center observed for experts indicates that expertise can inhibit the center-viewing tendency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the effects of viewing time, the results diverge. Locher et al (2007) found that a longer viewing time (100 ms vs. unlimited time, mean 32.5 s) raises the pleasingness of art stimuli, whereas Smith et al (2006) found no such effect (viewing times varying between 1, 5, 30, and 60 s). Moreover, Smith et al (2006), by either showing or omitting painting captions, noted that the information about a painting did not affect the ratings of viewers (mixed group of art-trained and lay viewers).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While eye-tracking investigations of many types of artworks have revealed a great inter individual variability in scan path characteristics, several systematic findings have emerged. For example, the spontaneous gaze behavior in viewing artworks seems to follow a “coarse-to-fine” strategy where an initial global sweep of the image is followed by a later period of visual scrutiny of finer local details (Locher et al, 2007). Furthermore, the points of high salience computed in terms of local feature differences in luminance, color and orientation were found to drive eye fixations in viewing abstract and representational artworks (Wallraven et al, 2007; DiPaola et al, 2010; Foulsham and Kingstone, 2010; Fuchs et al, 2011).…”
Section: How Does the Eye Search Through The Visual Complexity Of Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locher, Krupinski, Mello‐Thoms, and Nodine () took a more general approach to the time course of art perception to find out in what order different aspects of artworks are perceived. Based on their subjects’ free reports and eye movements, they propose that the change in pictorial properties of a percept (e.g., symmetry, complexity, structural features) might already reach a highly advanced stage after about 100 ms: Within 100 ms, people can extract enough information to form a significant holistic impression of the semantic meaning (i.e., gist) of paintings, including expressive aspects and ‘meaningful’ aesthetic judgements, as indicated by a significant correlation between pleasingness ratings at 100 ms and at unlimited PT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%