2017
DOI: 10.1177/1473871617714520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual languages: A graphical review

Abstract: We present a graphical review of the research on visual languages in the last 20 years. In particular, we gathered and analyzed the data about a set of publications in the field from 1995 to 2014. Visual techniques employed include graph-based visualization such as collaboration, co-citation, and co-word networks. We also adopted geographical views, alluvial diagrams, and timelined charts. The produced charts allowed us to have a deeper knowledge on the field of visual languages and on the scientific community… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three surveys (Costagliola et al, 2018; Federico et al, 2017; Kucher & Kerren, 2015) highlight the emerging importance of using meaningful visual representations for improving the sharing of publications' metadata within scientific communities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three surveys (Costagliola et al, 2018; Federico et al, 2017; Kucher & Kerren, 2015) highlight the emerging importance of using meaningful visual representations for improving the sharing of publications' metadata within scientific communities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them declared medium or high knowledge of parsers (they all had attended a course of compilers for their master's degree), all except one declared a medium or high knowledge of IntelliJ IDEA. 6 Eleven of them also had a medium or high knowledge of its debugging environment. Lastly, eleven of them had a medium or high ability to read and interpret the log file of CUP parser generator.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used PARVIS to visualize the behavior of many parsers, in particular, LR, GLRbased and top-down parsers for visual languages (VL parsers, in short), derived by both hypergraph [10] and positional grammars [9], and LALR(1) parsers as generated by the well-known parser generator CUP [36]. In the case of VL parsers (a significant part of VL research in the last 25 years [6]), the system has been used to help researchers in having useful feedbacks while building the corresponding parser generators. In the LALR case, the system has been used to help students to better understand how LALR parsing works and to have insights on the correctness of both the grammar they are writing and its input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parser generators make building string parsers a simple task [26,23,14]. A significant part of the research on visual languages in the last 25 years [5] has focused on the study of their semantics and the possibility to specify them in a formal way, also for use in visual programming languages. Researchers have therefore tried to analyze them using approaches similar to those used for strings, but with less success than in the string domain [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%