Visual Learning Equity: A Course Auditing System of Skin Color in Preclinical Medical Education

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Visual learning equity is a health justice effort in response to the lack of representation of brown and black skin images in medical education. This paucity creates a knowledge gap and decreases providers’ competence in managing skin disease in minoritized populations. Herein, we aimed to create a standardized course auditing system to assess the use of brown and black skin images in medical education. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2020-2021 preclinical curriculum at one US medical school. All human images in the learning material were analyzed. Skin color was categorized as light/white, medium/brown, and dark/black using the Massey-Martin New Immigrant Survey Skin Color Scale. Results: We included 1,660 unique images in our analysis; 71.3%, (n=1,183) were light/white, 16.1% (n=267) were medium/brown and 12.7% (n=210) were dark/black. Dermatologic images of skin, hair, nails, or mucosal disease made up 62.1% (n=1,031) of the images and 68.1% (n=702) were light/white. The pulmonary course presented the highest proportion of light/white skin (88.0%, n=44/50) and the dermatology course presented the lowest proportion of light/white skin (59.0%, n=301/510). Images of infectious diseases were more frequently presented in darker skin colors (χ2 [2]=15.46, P<.001). Conclusions: Light/white skin was the standard used for visual learning images in the medical school curriculum at this institution. The authors outline steps to perform a curriculum audit and diversify medical curricula to ensure the next generation of physicians are educated to care for all patients.

Anatomy's missing faces: An assessment of representation gaps in atlas and textbook imagery

“…24,25 Numerous studies have documented racial disparities in the imagery used in both specialty and multidisciplinary medical journals. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Most research on race representation in medical education has either focused on course materials used at a specific school, [32][33][34][35] or has been limited to the examination of a single specialty. Race or skin tone audits of dermatology educational materials are relatively common, likely due to the high importance of visual diagnosis in this field.…”