1980
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual masking: Mechanisms and theories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that visual resu~ts similar to those seen in Figure 10 have not necessarily been interpreted as supporting interruptive mechanisms (Felsten & Wasserman, 1980). Also, integration may be affected by the difference in intensity between the target and its complement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, it should be noted that visual resu~ts similar to those seen in Figure 10 have not necessarily been interpreted as supporting interruptive mechanisms (Felsten & Wasserman, 1980). Also, integration may be affected by the difference in intensity between the target and its complement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Should alternative-target displays be found to be superior to identical-target displays only when a visual mask is employed, this result would probably give us more information about the nature of visual masking rather than reflect upon the validity of the featurespecific model. The mechanisms of visual masking are still controversial (Felsten & Wasserman, 1981). Thus, experiments that employ visual masks when the masking itself is not under investigation run the high risk of having the interpretation of their results critically dependent upon assumptions concerning the processes that underlie masking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interruption masking is not the only prevailing theory that can explain why pattern masks disrupt the perception of alphabetic targets. For example, it has been known for some time that the sensory qualities of target and mask can become integrated to form a composite percept incorporating aspects of both stimulus fields (e.g., see Breitmeyer, 1984;Felsten & Wasserman, 1980;Ganz, 1975;Jordan, 1990, in press). Thus, although backward pattern masks have the potential for interrupting target processing, it is far from clear that interruption, rather than integration, plays a critical role in the WLP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%