2009
DOI: 10.1101/lm.1315109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual object pattern separation deficits in nondemented older adults

Abstract: Young and nondemented older adults were tested on a continuous recognition memory task requiring visual pattern separation. During the task, some objects were repeated across trials and some objects, referred to as lures, were presented that were similar to previously presented objects. The lures resulted in increased interference and an increased need for pattern separation. For each object, the participant was asked to indicate whether (1) this was the first time the object was seen (new), (2) the object was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

41
207
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
41
207
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may also be why responses here but not in the previous study were also less accurate for lures than for studied and novel items. The pattern observed here is consistent with previous findings of reduced performance for lures (e.g., Stark et al, 2013;Toner et al, 2009), and with claims that lure discrimination places greater demands on pattern separation (Kirwan and Stark, 2007; and/or post-retrieval processing (Brainerd et al, 2003;Morcom, 2015) and is therefore associated with reduced accuracy.…”
Section: Behavioural Findingssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may also be why responses here but not in the previous study were also less accurate for lures than for studied and novel items. The pattern observed here is consistent with previous findings of reduced performance for lures (e.g., Stark et al, 2013;Toner et al, 2009), and with claims that lure discrimination places greater demands on pattern separation (Kirwan and Stark, 2007; and/or post-retrieval processing (Brainerd et al, 2003;Morcom, 2015) and is therefore associated with reduced accuracy.…”
Section: Behavioural Findingssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Faster RTs at study to both repeated and similar items are consistent with priming of similar items based on overlapping perceptual or conceptual features (Stenberg et al, 2009). Performance on the 'same/similar/new' recognition test was similar to that in previous reports (Garoff et al, 2005;Stark et al, 2013;Toner et al, 2009) with participants most often correctly classifying studied, lure and novel images as 'same', 'similar' and 'new', respectively.…”
Section: Behavioural Findingssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Critically, the extent of this representational rigidity predicted the performance of older adults on an explicit recognition task that directly tested their pattern separation abilities. This task was used to demonstrate agerelated impairments in pattern separation (20,21). Further, there was evidence for a relationship between the rigidity in DG/CA3 fMRI activity and a simple standardized test of delayed recall performance, a memory measure that is known to be sensitive to hippocampal damage (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Converging evidence from animals (1) and humans (20,21,36) demonstrates that, on a behavioral level, pattern separation abilities are reduced with aging. This deficit is hypothesized to underlie We found a negative relationship between the left DG/CA3 slope of activity in older adults and their separation bias on an explicit recognition task designed to tax their pattern separation abilities, suggesting that processing in this region plays a key role in discrimination and that its dysfunction with age may underlie mnemonic deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation